The Internet? Bah!

Started by Dave W, November 08, 2010, 03:00:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Dave W

1995 Newsweek article

If the author's wikipedia entry is accurate, he was qualified to write about computers back then. Funny how wrong he was. Or as one commenter said, Legendary Failure.

OldManC


Psycho Bass Guy

#2
I remember reading that when it was current. What the author failed to take into account was people's capacity to absorb lots of intellectual garbage and their willingness to abandon what traditional media regarded as "sacred" institutions. Newspapers are dead; non-infotainment news is dying, and 80% of kids aged 19 and under say that everything you read on the internet is true. He missed the point because he was imagining a brighter future.

Pilgrim

The author comes off as a bit of a Luddite today...and has been proven wrong in a number of issues.

One of the important differences is that many people are no longer able to, or interested in, telling fact from fiction.  Evaluating sources of online information is an increasingly important but increasingly neglected skill.
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any other invention with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila."

ack1961

He's so right.  The Internet will never catch on.
Have Fun.  Be Nice.  Mean People Suck.

uwe

I could live with a little less of it. I like newspapers, weekly magazines with well-researched and -worded articles and music from a CD.
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

Highlander

The random mind of a Silver Surfer...
If research was easy, it wouldn't need doing...
Staring at that event horizon is a dirty job, but someone has to do it; something's going to come back out of it one day...