No matter what the media says, it's not the largest mass shooting in US history. The massacre at Wounded Knee, the Branch Davidian massacre in Waco... oh wait, I guess it isn't terrorism when the government murders its own citizens.
Restricting the rights of all gun owners because of the actions of a few makes as much sense as restricting the rights of all Muslims because of the actions of a few.
I read this earlier and it has been bothering me. There is no comparison between military and law enforcement actions gone bad and the actions of a single crazed individual. The argument is meaningless, regardless of how misguided or reprehensible Wounded Knee or Waco might have been (I lived near Waco at the time that happened, and my opinion differs, but that's not relevant either.)
If you will, this is the largest mass shooting in the history of the US
by a single individual. Better?
And as a firearms owner of long standing, I believe it's time to do something. I offer one bottom line: THE SOLUTION IS NOT MORE GUNS. I reject the NRA line that everyone should be armed. While serving as a reserve Deputy, I met many idiots and bad actors who I hope never own a firearm. They won't do anything good with them.
The answer to public shootings is not for everyone to go armed and generate a public firefight, either. There would be as many or more casualties from panic and execrable shooting, and when the police do arrive, they're as likely to shoot the self-appointed "good guys" as they are the bad guys.
Somehow, by some method, we need to find ways to keep people who are mentally ill or driven by hate from getting firearms. This is one position the gun lobby has refused to even consider. They won't allow universal background checks, which are only a tiny part of the answer, but still a positive part of it. Police even back this idea:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guns-police-idUSKCN0SK2RR20151026 They won't allow police to trace firearms firearms history across all states, thanks to the Tihart amendments, which currently prohibit ATF from releasing firearm trace data for use by cities, states, researchers, litigants and members of the public, except in aggregate form.
http://smartgunlaws.org/maintaining-gun-sales-background-check-records-policy-summary/ Want a summary of the problems?
http://smartgunlaws.org/gun-trafficking-straw-purchasing-policy-summary/ Now remember, I own multiple handguns and rifles. I've been shooting since I was 12. I'm not eager to give them up, and I see no reason that I need to. But I'm neither a hate-filled fanatic or (other than the evidence provided by tweaking Dave with this post) subject to mental problems.
We need to figure out that some people are not worthy of owning firearms. Period. And we need to find a way to limit their access to firearms. I'd like to see the gun lobby contributing to that simple approach instead of trying to arm cats, dogs and infants.
I feel like Viper in Top Gun, facing Maverick and saying (paraphrased as necessary):
"The simple fact is you feel responsible for these deaths and you have a firearms problem. Now I'm not gonna sit here and blow sunshine up your ass. A good citizen is compelled to evaluate what's happened, so he can apply what he's learned. In a democracy, we gotta regulate ourselves. That's our job. It's your option, citizen. All yours."