Redesigned Les Paul OSB

Started by stiles72, November 26, 2012, 05:38:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

drbassman

Amen on the 2 ton Grover tuners!  I'm not a fan of them on the Gibsons.
I'm fixin' a hole where the rain gets in..........cuz I'm built for a kilt!

Grog

I like the new headstock better, it's a better match to the Les Paul Signature. (How's that for Anal Retentive?) That being said, I'm not going to collect for headstocks, I hope.......... :P
There's no such thing as gravity, the earth just sucks!!

4stringer77

I like the Schaller M4 look of the Grovers. I can't say the weight of them is a noticible factor on my bass.
Contrary to what James Bond says, a good Gibson should be stirred, not shaken.

Barklessdog

Quote from: uwe on November 27, 2012, 05:21:15 AM
No, I think the original headstock has more of a bass tradition with Gibson as it has been used on a lot of basses since the early nineties. The larger headstock just rips off the guitar look.

Will I need to get one though? Do I collect for heqadstocks?


Of coarse you do. who knows what else id different?

planetgaffnet

Got to say I prefer the new squarer headstock to the other, but that said, not a fan of Les Paul basses, period. 

Working at Gibson's R&D must be one of the easiest jobs going...pretty much everything this year (EB aside...shudder) has been rejigged versions of existing models or reissues of those long dead.    What's left?  The Victory?  The Bass IV?  EBO?  (Yes please on the EBO, but if you're reading this R&D, no banjo tuners, eh?). 

Seriously, how difficult would it be to take a leaf out of the Reverend model and produce something unique like the Dub King?

Rant over.
P
The future I come from no longer exists.

4stringer77

Yeah a reproduction EB0 would be nice, but I'm guessing that the original mudbucker with 25,000 wraps on the coils won't be made again by Gibson. For what it's worth my double cut Les Paul bass is a wonderful instrument and one I would never trade or sell.
Contrary to what James Bond says, a good Gibson should be stirred, not shaken.

drbassman

Having had 4 LP basses, I have to say they all sounded great, but I had trouble handling the neck and/or weight of them.  My problem!
I'm fixin' a hole where the rain gets in..........cuz I'm built for a kilt!

uwe

Quote from: Dobby on November 28, 2012, 04:19:07 AM

Of coarse you do. who knows what else id different?

John Fertig aka Barkless Dog aka now  :o "Dobby",






you live!!!
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

Dave W

He's been Dobby for two or three months now. You just noticed?

uwe

I was about to write an email to you "Where the hell is John"? Seriously. Maybe he is jsut avoiding prog threads after you successfully intimidated him re his love for John McLaughlin.  :mrgreen:
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

Dave W

Quote from: uwe on November 28, 2012, 08:56:35 AM
I was about to write an email to you "Where the hell is John"? Seriously. Maybe he is jsut avoiding prog threads after you successfully intimidated him re his love for John McLaughlin.  :mrgreen:

I wasn't aware proggies could be intimidated!  :mrgreen: That discussion must have been a good eight years ago at the Pit, I'm sure he's participated in more than a few prog threads since then.

Basvarken

Quote from: planetgaffnet on November 28, 2012, 06:12:25 AM
Got to say I prefer the new squarer headstock to the other, but that said, not a fan of Les Paul basses, period. 



The old headstock is the squarer one...

www.brooksbassguitars.com
www.thegibsonbassbook.com

uwe

#27
Make up your mind, Rob, and stop confusing people, which one do you now like better, the wider or the narrower (concave-edged) one?!
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

Basvarken

www.brooksbassguitars.com
www.thegibsonbassbook.com

planetgaffnet

Quote from: Basvarken on November 28, 2012, 09:06:41 AM
The old headstock is the squarer one...

Really?  Now I'm confused and I apologise.  I thought the tapered headstock was the original and the squarer one the newer design.  Irrespective, still prefer the squarer one, but not a fan of the bass overall.
P
The future I come from no longer exists.