Gibson Nonreverese reissuie a reality

Denis · July 21, 2013, 07:19:57 AM

There are two on eBay right now. Still, I'm glad I got mine when I did, especially since I think it was one of the first couple bursts to make it out!

the mojo hobo · July 21, 2013, 01:04:37 PM

I actually regret getting my blue one even though it was one of the first NRs to make it out. I only played it twice. The first time was great. The second time was a 4 hour gig and it gave me shoulder pain even using a wide strap. On the other hand I hadn't played my Bach since before I got the Gibson NR until last night and it sounded awesome and felt good too.

Denis · July 21, 2013, 04:11:59 PM

There's no mistaking that it's a big bass! 4 hours is a long time to stand watching a show as well!

the mojo hobo · July 21, 2013, 05:11:45 PM

I think mine is on the heavy side.

And I have become used to using a Carvin that is a feather-weight.

Blackbird · July 22, 2013, 05:47:01 AM

I'm really looking forward to mine when it's in. Bass weight doesn't usually bother me much, but I'm not playing in a multi-set band either.

the mojo hobo · July 22, 2013, 05:08:30 PM

I'm pretty sure it will sound great.

uwe · July 23, 2013, 05:22:10 AM

If not, I'm to blame, I recommended it.

Blackbird · July 23, 2013, 07:53:13 AM

Quote from: uwe on July 23, 2013, 05:22:10 AM
If not, I'm to blame, I recommended it.

I know I won't be disappointed!

I'm just debating on adding one of those Edge Gibson straps I saw...but $150 is a lotta dough for a strap. But dang is it nice..

uwe · July 23, 2013, 08:38:00 AM

It's not Victory-style heavy! That bassy substance (more than both an original or a B&CH would have) has to come from somewhere.

Too heavy basses --- tsk, tsk, tsk ... are people in this forum getting old or what?

Dave W · July 23, 2013, 08:49:54 AM

Quote from: uwe on July 23, 2013, 08:38:00 AM
It's not Victory-style heavy! That bassy substance (more than both an original or a B&CH would have) has to come from somewhere.

Too heavy basses --- tsk, tsk, tsk ... are people in this forum getting old or what?

I'm not old, I'm chronologically gifted.

Balance is more important to me than weight. If it's heavy but well balanced, that's usually okay with me. Better that than a neck diving lightweight.

uwe · July 23, 2013, 11:41:12 AM

To me, no Non Rev will ever sit as good as a Rev, but it is not an uncomfortable bass. My B&CH though would have been drafted as a Czech national into a Stuka squadron no doubt. The body is just too light. Almost as bad as an Epiphone Embassy.

Blackbird · July 23, 2013, 02:11:45 PM

Just picked it up, and back at the office. And no, my office is not like one of our fellow Gibson players/collectors!

Only had a 10 minute test drive at the store:

1) Vintage burst simply looks great! I already forgot I sold a 4003 for it.

2) Neck feels a bit meatier all around compared to my 2002 'bird, but not by much (at least by feel).

3) While I'll still be 95% pick playing, this is much more finger-style friendly than '02 bird

4) Sound...tough for me to describe right now since it was a small amp....but it is a pleasant surprise (again, what 4003??)! It's similar to the bird, but different. I'll have a real idea when I rehearse on Thursday. Bridge pickup only dials in a nice jazzy tone. Seems tighter like the Money bass I had.

5) Weight is a non-issue, doesn't really feel any heavier than the 02 rev.

6) Having clear access up to 19 frets is unusual.....as I do like to visit there..

Thanks again for the recommendation, Uwe. It was a last-minute thought when I messaged you when I added that to the list

uwe · July 23, 2013, 04:49:26 PM

We aim to serve.

In a band situation, it should offer considerably more ooomph than any Rev. A Rev is sweeter in the high register, but for pushing a band forward, look no further than this beast ...

planetgaffnet · July 24, 2013, 01:08:49 AM

Quote from: Blackbird on July 23, 2013, 02:11:45 PM
4) Sound...tough for me to describe right now since it was a small amp....but it is a pleasant surprise (again, what 4003??)! It's similar to the bird, but different. I'll have a real idea when I rehearse on Thursday. Bridge pickup only dials in a nice jazzy tone. Seems tighter like the Money bass I had.

Hmmm. Mine was just mud. It's well documented elsewhere. Took it to my tech and he replaced all the guts with decent pots. The Gibson pots were just sucking all the life out of it. Tonally (now), it's Thunderbirdish, but phatter, probably due to the body mass. I like it a lot (now), but it's never going to be my go-to bass.
P

Blackbird · July 24, 2013, 06:23:27 AM

Quote from: planetgaffnet on July 24, 2013, 01:08:49 AM
Hmmm. Mine was just mud. It's well documented elsewhere. Took it to my tech and he replaced all the guts with decent pots. The Gibson pots were just sucking all the life out of it. Tonally (now), it's Thunderbirdish, but phatter, probably due to the body mass. I like it a lot (now), but it's never going to be my go-to bass.
P

That's really interesting. I'd say that it seems more focused overall, but tomorrow's the bigger test.