Author Topic: Zebrano vs. mahogany  (Read 1926 times)

Chris P.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5247
  • Warwickhoer
    • View Profile
    • The La La Lies
Zebrano vs. mahogany
« on: April 21, 2008, 12:14:00 PM »
I think we never discussed this here:

Some of you guys have a zebrano Thunderbird of the GOW-series. Unfortunately I haven't tried Uwe's. How do they sound? What's the big difference with mahogany?

Barklessdog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4473
    • View Profile
Re: Zebrano vs. mahogany
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2008, 12:22:16 PM »
Warmoth-
Quote
Zebrawood (Microberlinia brazzavillensis):
You may see where Zebrawood gets its name. The distinctive look tells you it's none other than Zebrawood! This open grained wood is very heavy so it's primarily used as a bookmatched laminate top. When used as a body its tone is similar to maple.


Chris P.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5247
  • Warwickhoer
    • View Profile
    • The La La Lies
Re: Zebrano vs. mahogany
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2008, 12:43:24 PM »
Thanx!

Dave W

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 22244
  • Got time to breathe, got time for music
    • View Profile
Re: Zebrano vs. mahogany
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2008, 12:58:31 PM »
I wouldn't rely on Warmoth for accurate descriptions of tone.

Chris P.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5247
  • Warwickhoer
    • View Profile
    • The La La Lies
Re: Zebrano vs. mahogany
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2008, 01:06:15 PM »
Then we'll have to wait on a full report by Herr Köllektör.

Barklessdog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4473
    • View Profile
Re: Zebrano vs. mahogany
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2008, 01:33:07 PM »
He said it sounds more warwick than Tbird, in a good way.

angrymatt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 179
    • View Profile
Re: Zebrano vs. mahogany
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2008, 03:37:54 PM »
I love mine.  Unfortunately it is the only T-bird I have, so I can't offer a comparison.
angrymatt, the lurk
'13 NR Thunder "Blue" Bird | '09 BaCHBird | '07 Zebrabird | '06 Tobias Growler | '03 Spector Rebop 5 | '87 Heritage

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21446
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
Re: Zebrano vs. mahogany
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2008, 04:00:21 AM »
It sounds more middish, but the mids aren't blurry, they're focused. I find that Warwick'ish. It also has less lively treble than any full maho TB I own, it's like the highest range of presence is cut off even with new strings, nothing for lovers of piano rrring then (makes me wonder whether Warwick zebrano wood basses always come with active electronics to add just that presence). But it sits well in a band sound, a bit bony, focused, less "all over" than a reg TB tends to be. Your preferred TBird for a fusion style band, but if you want to fill as much as you can you're better served with the full maho version.

It's a different voice, not better than a reg TB, just different.

My guitar shop has ordered the new Nikki Sixx Blackbird with maple wings for me (unlike the Shavo TBird it can already be ordered), once that is in, it will be interesting to see how that compares to the Zebrabird.

Uwe
« Last Edit: April 23, 2008, 03:17:19 AM by uwe »
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

Barklessdog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4473
    • View Profile
Re: Zebrano vs. mahogany
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2008, 04:34:09 AM »
(unlike the Shavo TBird it can already be ordered)

I read that the Shavo bird was designed to be played by the guitarist?

OldManC

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3116
    • View Profile
Re: Zebrano vs. mahogany
« Reply #9 on: April 22, 2008, 08:07:09 PM »
(unlike the Shavo TBird it can already be ordered)

I read that the Shavo bird was designed to be played by the guitarist?

 ;D