Brooks Thread

Started by Basvarken, May 13, 2017, 01:29:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Rob

Personally I think that the headstock detail REALLY sets this apart.

wellREDman

#241
that headstock looks beautiful on a bird!

Basvarken

Here's a video to give you an impression of the sounds of the Brooks Grabbird

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t98NAXLGCxM
www.brooksbassguitars.com
www.thegibsonbassbook.com

ilan


4stringer77

A P bass killer in the neck position and a Stingray killer in the bridge position. Great job. I can see a five string version working well on this platform too. :thumbsup:
Contrary to what James Bond says, a good Gibson should be stirred, not shaken.

OldManC

Absolutely beautiful, and it sounds as good as it looks!

Dave W

Sounds great, especially in the neck position (I'm biased).

amptech

Quote from: 4stringer77 on March 01, 2020, 07:37:15 PM
A P bass killer in the neck position and a Stingray killer in the bridge position. Great job. I can see a five string version working well on this platform too. :thumbsup:

A Grabber killer in both positions ;D

Basvarken

I am pleasantly surprised by the difference in sound between the neck position and the bridge position.
An often heard criticism about the Grabber is that the sliding mechanism is just a gimmick with little or no effect for the sound. This clearly isn't the case with the Grabbird.  :toast:
www.brooksbassguitars.com
www.thegibsonbassbook.com

ilan

Quote from: 4stringer77 on March 01, 2020, 07:37:15 PM
a Stingray killer in the bridge position

I like it a lot but I don't exactly hear a Stingray there. What I perceive as a MM/J(bridge) tone is there about 2.5-3" from the bridge, at >4" it's gone. Like a real Grabber, the pickup doesn't go back enough for that.

4stringer77

Quote from: ilan on March 02, 2020, 02:40:56 AM
I like it a lot but I don't exactly hear a Stingray there. What I perceive as a MM/J(bridge) tone is there about 2.5-3" from the bridge, at >4" it's gone. Like a real Grabber, the pickup doesn't go back enough for that.

That's probably why it's better. Bite without the honk.
As an aside, I'm proud nobody here has taken the opportunity to make jokes with the double entendre that the name Grabbird could entail. Stay classy outposters.  ;)
Contrary to what James Bond says, a good Gibson should be stirred, not shaken.

Basvarken

Haha wait till Uwe chimes in :mrgreen:
www.brooksbassguitars.com
www.thegibsonbassbook.com

slinkp

Great work! I like it.
Basses: Gibson lpb-1, Gibson dc jr tribute, Greco thunderbird, Danelectro dc, Ibanez blazer.  Amps: genz benz shuttle 6.0, EA CXL110, EA CXL112, Spark 40.  Guitars: Danelectro 59XT, rebuilt cheap LP copy

BTL

That's so cool...congratulations!

amptech

Quote from: Basvarken on March 02, 2020, 01:28:31 AM
I am pleasantly surprised by the difference in sound between the neck position and the bridge position.
An often heard criticism about the Grabber is that the sliding mechanism is just a gimmick with little or no effect for the sound. This clearly isn't the case with the Grabbird.  :toast:

Little or no effect would be stretching it a bit far. It's not as dramatic as in your Grabbird vid, but it is very useful. I used to think the bridge position was too aggressive on it's own, especially with stainless strings, and always kept it in neck pos. But live, if the stage sound became too muddy, it was nice to slide it down and cut through. Later I found out that Thomastik Rounds made it sound more organic (as organic as a Grabber can sound) and eventually it got flats.

But no matter what I strung it up with, I could never match the sound you get out of that sliding bird of yours - pretty impressive!