Author Topic: kalamazoo semi acoustic project  (Read 3474 times)

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21533
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
Re: kalamazoo semi acoustic project
« Reply #15 on: September 15, 2010, 02:57:45 AM »
I think we should be over the point were anything from Japan in the seventies is regarded as junk. For producing junk, they did a darn good job conquering the market and with some justification you can say that Ibanez, Yamaha, ESP, Fernandes and what have you can call themselves bass companies with greater justification than Gibson can.
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

dadagoboi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4214
  • huh?...HUH?
    • View Profile
    • CATALDO BASSES
Re: kalamazoo semi acoustic project
« Reply #16 on: September 15, 2010, 04:42:00 AM »
I think we should be over the point were anything from Japan in the seventies is regarded as junk. For producing junk, they did a darn good job conquering the market and with some justification you can say that Ibanez, Yamaha, ESP, Fernandes and what have you can call themselves bass companies with greater justification than Gibson can.

AMEN!

Stjofön Big

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 885
    • View Profile
Re: kalamazoo semi acoustic project
« Reply #17 on: September 15, 2010, 06:48:55 AM »
A country that could produce receivers like http://cgi.ebay.com/PIONEER-SA-9100-AC-110-120V-Best-Integrated-Amplifier-/300430716915?pt=Vintage_Electronics_R2&hash=item45f310eff3#ht_573wt_1137 can't have been all wrong! My neighbour is selling one just like that, for $250.00. Guess who's buying! Yeah, you're right. That's why there's no question mark.

OldManC

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3116
    • View Profile
Re: kalamazoo semi acoustic project
« Reply #18 on: September 15, 2010, 08:02:14 AM »
I think we should be over the point were anything from Japan in the seventies is regarded as junk.

The 70's were as long a decade as any other and the level of a lot of the Japanese guitars that made their way to the U.S., especially in the first half of the 70's, still deserve that tag. I agree that era represents when Japan rose from producing cheap knockoffs to quality and innovation in their own right, but being wary of what level of product you're getting would still serve one well with Japanese guitars. Even now they differentiate between domestic and export quality. The 'luckiest' buyer is an educated one.

Droombolus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
  • Younger Old Fart
    • View Profile
Re: kalamazoo semi acoustic project
« Reply #19 on: September 15, 2010, 08:56:38 AM »
IMHO it sounds better than my rivoli reissue

They play great but the stock PUPs on those babies suck big time ........
Experience is the ultimate teacher

leftybass

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
    • View Profile
Re: kalamazoo semi acoustic project
« Reply #20 on: September 15, 2010, 09:02:39 AM »
Speaking of, my reissue Rivoli has always had weak output from the G string, does anyone have any experience with the Artec replacement pickups on ebay?
"Top 10 Best Bass Players" 2014 Austin Music Poll
"Top 10 Best Bass Players" 2013 Austin Music Poll
"Top 10 Best Bass Players" 2012 Austin Music Poll
"Top 10 Best Bass Players" 2011 Austin Music Poll
"Top 10 Best Bass Players" 2010 Austin Music Poll

Proud owner of Dee Murray's Steinberger.

Psycho Bass Guy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2312
    • View Profile
Re: kalamazoo semi acoustic project
« Reply #21 on: September 15, 2010, 05:23:27 PM »
I don't know about the basses, and I think that it's pretty well established that the one in question is Japanese, but I used to have an Epiphone 12 string acoustic guitar that was made in the USA. It had an orange sticker IRRC. It was old and had a cracked top which I repaired, but it held tune and sounded great. I traded it and a late 80's Ibanez SR500 for a Marcus Miller Jazz (speaking of quality Japanese products) and $500 ten years ago and I don't regret it for a second. I had $100 in the pair.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2010, 06:03:48 PM by Psycho Bass Guy »

Droombolus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
  • Younger Old Fart
    • View Profile
Re: kalamazoo semi acoustic project
« Reply #22 on: September 16, 2010, 10:06:21 AM »
Speaking of, my reissue Rivoli has always had weak output from the G string, does anyone have any experience with the Artec replacement pickups on ebay?


Yes I do, the Artec's are a bit too deep to fit the cavity but I mounted one anyway  :mrgreen:. They sound better than the stock PUP to my ears. The cheaper solution however is the "Nail-That-Sound" mod. Some guys at the dutch bassforum bent 2 nails and taped them to the PUP to extend the range of the magnet. Apparently it works .........  ;D  PeterB knows the specifics.

Experience is the ultimate teacher

Basvarken

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6902
  • hobby luthier. gibson bass nerd
    • View Profile
    • www.brooksbassguitars.com
Re: kalamazoo semi acoustic project
« Reply #23 on: September 16, 2010, 10:32:27 AM »
Yep, here it is




Nail That ToneTM

Pilgrim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9995
    • View Profile
    • YouTube channel
Re: kalamazoo semi acoustic project
« Reply #24 on: September 16, 2010, 02:57:42 PM »
They play great but the stock PUPs on those babies suck big time ........

That's somewhat true of the staple pickups on my Univox hollowbody, which is why one of my long-neglected projects is replacing them with Gretsch Filtertrons!
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any other invention with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila."