Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Basvarken

Pages: 1 ... 452 453 [454] 455 456 ... 461
6796
Here's a short soundclip of the mysterious Hobbit.

neck pickup
bridge pikcup
both pickup

tone selector on 3
in phase
vol 10
treble 10
bass 10

Straight in to Garageband through my Minidisk recorder as interface (eq flat)





6797
Rinus has his own site with lots of info on his gear. And his personal roadie/tech always answers emails about his gear.

http://www.goldenearring.nl/rinus/index-menu.htm



Quote
As Rinus always says in interviews, he is very proud of his basses. The reason for building this beast was as follows. Rinus always liked to play a Danelectro, it has this special twangy sound, but certain song arrangements ask for a more neutral bass-sound like that of a Fender. Due to the fact that a Danelectro was a short scale, Rinus had to play with a pick and that's why he plays guitar-bass and not bass-guitar.


As Rinus states in interviews, he is very proud of his basses. Of the doubleneck's conception, he explains, "I've always missed the hard fat attack of a real Fender bass. I've always played my Danelectro because I liked the sound of it a lot. Due to the fact that my Danelectro was a short-scale, I had to play with a pick and that's why I play guitar-bass and not bass-guitar! "I came to the idea of combining both a Fender and a Danelectro in one guitar... The result of it is my double-neck. During that time I had made many drawings on paper and my dad was a very handy man!

The main thing and beginning of making the doubleneck is the fretboard: I needed a strong fat-sounding neck, and I came to a Fender '62 Precision bass. The neck of these guitars are very very strong, and the strings are very straight for a fat attack. I used the neck for my doubleneck. The next thing I needed was, of course, a good sound and some good pickups. One of the pickups I used were Danelectros - these pickups are very good in the high tones, but not so good in the low tones. For the low ones I picked an older Framus Nashville bass and used the pickup of it - Bill Lawrence." As shown in the photo, Rinus used the Bill Lawrence pickups both on the Fender and the Danelectro side. The Danelectro pickups (the small ones) are also on both sides.

"Making the body was the most complicated thing - a good body is very important for a good sound! Of course I am not a guitarbuilder, but with some close friends who are guitarbuilders and a very handy dad I had no problems making this guitar complete! From my friends I heard that I needed a hard but easy-to-manipulate fine-graining woodpiece. That was not an easy task, because I needed a huge piece, but I...found it. The shape I used was the same as the Danelectro's, but combining two guitars was a problem with balancing. As you may know the Danelectro basses are hollow; exactly the same thing I did with my doubleneck: the top bass" (Fender) "is completely solid but the second bass" (Danelectro) "is hollow. That's why I actually have an Electric and a Semi-Acoustic bass in one. The balance problem was gone, but I felt a certain wobbliness during the playing so I had pasted a heavy piece of wood underneath the second bass and it did the trick!"

 

Rinus plays the Doubleneck at electric concerts, as well as his fretless Darwin bass. The doubleneck is full of secret gadgets. In songs like Long Blond Animal / Radar Love / Sleepwalking he plays the second bass, and switches to the normal bass on top- a struggle, but Rinus built a switch in the body for an easy shift between the top and bottom basses. When playing the lower bass he uses Moog Taurus pedals to complete the bass sound, as sometimes the sound drops out in the switching. Another trick: he uses stereo cables with a splitter at the end, splitting the bass sound into two channels, the low and the high tones (Danelectro pickups and Bill Lawrence pickups.) Rinus never spent more then 500 EURO on his guitars.


6798
Today I picked up the Les Paul Bass "prototype / employee model" at the local post office.

The first thing you notice when you hold it, is the weight. It is substantially lighter than the Les Paul Bass (aka Recording)

The prototype weighs 3.9 kilograms.
The Les Paul Bass weighs 5.1 kilograms.
The Triumph weighs, 4.8 kilograms.

Of course it is no surprise that it should weigh less. There's a huge swimming pool routing underneath that black controlplate. Plus the body is less thick. It measures 38 mm at the edges. (The Les Paul bass is 50mm thick at the edges. (In the middle even thicker because of the curved top)

The neck is exactly the same as the Les Paul Bass.
Except for the neck joint at the body.

The prototype meets the body at the E string at the 19th fret. The Les Paul bass at the 15th. And the the G string even at the  21st fret  (the Les Paul at the 15th)
How is that for upper fret access?!

The neck joint does seem to have been broken. Although the seller stated that the scratches were only superficial, there's remnants of glue at one of the cracks.




Due to the lighter body it is slightly neck heavy.
(Both the Les Paul Bass and Triumph balance perfectly)


The pots are a bit scratchy. Especially the volume pot even drops out if you pull the shaft.

The pickups are not sealed in epoxy! Finally a chance to see what's under the hood.
They are definitely handcrafted. The green(!) wire is not wound very neatly. And there are folded pieces of cardboard on the sides keeping the pickup in place inside the big plastic pickup cover.






There's a huge grey "thing" in the wiring harness that I can't quite explain. When I saw it in the Ebay pictures I thought it might be an impedance transformer, but the output of this bass is even a bit lower than the Les Paul Bass which doesn't have a transformer at all. Maybe Jake can tell from the picture? Jake?





I like the large machine heads. They work more precise (IMHO) Plus they are better for long scale strings on a short scale bass because the radius of the string post is wider on these large tuners.
They are not the original ones. I can clearly see the footprint of the former ones  because the new ones have no upper part of the back plate. Are these special light weight tuners perhaps?





The bass sounds similar to the Les Paul Bass. Although it doesn't sound as fat as the Les Paul Bass or Triumph. It has less output and does not sound as tight. Maybe that is because the body just has less wood? I hear difference in fatness between the Les Paul and Triumph too so that might very well be it.


I'll take it to the gig next saturday. Let's see if it's ready to rock.


Thanx again Uwe for your unselfishness!!

6799
Gibson Basses / Re: LP Signature. An interesting discovery.
« on: May 12, 2008, 09:26:39 AM »
Definitely a bass pickup. Guitar pickups are much smaller.

They did use thick wire. I have one of those black Les Paul bass pickups and I tried to remove the casing because it didn't function 100%. I saw the very thick wire -for pickups standards- come from under the epoxyd.

If you ever want to get rid of the pickup let me know :P





6800
Gibson Basses / Re: LP Signature. An interesting discovery.
« on: May 12, 2008, 04:49:34 AM »


of course Basvarken made a very nice replica. Add some pics again, Rob!

it's here

The picture on Jules site (that Daniel posted above) was my inspiration.

6801
Gibson Basses / Re: LP Signature. An interesting discovery.
« on: May 12, 2008, 04:11:18 AM »
Very interesting Daniel!
I might very well be an original. Would this mean that Gibson made two series of the LP Sig bass? The first series with the cream stacked humbucker with rounded edges plus chrome ring and the second series with the square cream humbucker with plastic square surround?

But... the Black Les Paul Bass pickups have eight wires. The one in the picture only has two.
The Elektar pickup on the Epi JCS has only three wires. It has a ground wire that I don't see on this pickup that you've found.

It would be interesting to know what the dimensions are to determine wether it's a guitar pickup or really a bass pickup.

Did you buy it?




6802
Bass Amps & Effects / Re: your favorite pedal overall
« on: May 11, 2008, 05:35:59 AM »
Till this day I use only one pedal. It's the Boss OC2. The octaver. I use it a lot.
I love the grit you get when you dial it in.

I bought the OC3 a while ago because it it was said to have better tracking. But it just hasn't got the "mojo" that the OC2 does have.
Come to think of it I should sell it. Haven't used it for over a year.


I'm still waiting on my first basscreamer pedal; a modified tubescreamer with clean blend.

6803
Gibson Basses / Re: Better by the pair..........2 white LPs
« on: May 10, 2008, 12:04:41 PM »
It can only have been Steve Morse (and he is still with Purple, Tommy Bolin is in heaven and Ritchie Blackmore lives in the Renaissance period)... and you were not worthy, Jake!
Didn't Satriani fill the spot for a couple of gigs?

6804
Gibson Basses / Re: Better by the pair..........2 white LPs
« on: May 02, 2008, 12:21:30 AM »
Wow!
But 7500 BIN is too high if you ask me...

6805
The Outpost Cafe / Re: Logo design gone wrong
« on: April 29, 2008, 11:27:37 AM »
less sociable - eye-sight impairing - adult recreational scenarios ... 

Uwe you are lethal! Absolutely brilliant.

6806
The Outpost Cafe / Re: 20 years ago today
« on: April 29, 2008, 05:44:28 AM »
Congratulations Scott!!

Cheers,




here's to another 20

6807
Gibson Basses / Re: Did we ever do a "Me and my Gibson" thread?
« on: April 28, 2008, 03:32:45 PM »
Here's a picture of me and my Les Paul Bass. Taken last summer on a very hot sunny day  8)




6808
Gibson Basses / Re: It's back...
« on: April 28, 2008, 12:24:27 AM »
Cool! Good luck George

6809
The Bass Zone / large hands? no problem
« on: April 25, 2008, 07:52:24 AM »

6810
Gibson Basses / Re: Which EB for me?
« on: April 25, 2008, 06:11:11 AM »
why would a buzzard need to travel by plane?

Pages: 1 ... 452 453 [454] 455 456 ... 461