The Last Bass Outpost

Gear Discussion Forums => Fender Basses => Topic started by: Chris P. on October 27, 2014, 01:52:11 AM

Title: New Clayton sig
Post by: Chris P. on October 27, 2014, 01:52:11 AM
http://forbassplayersonly.com/news-fender-announces-adam-clayton-signature-bass/

I'm not very into J's, but this colour, matching headstock, block markers... imagine it with more chrome!
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Pilgrim on October 27, 2014, 07:06:00 AM
(http://forbassplayersonly.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Clayton-bass1.jpg)

Doesn't look all that different from any other J, but I love the color and the matching headstock.  Add a bridge cover and pickup cover, and there's enough chrome to make me happy!
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Dave W on October 27, 2014, 07:30:59 AM
The color in that pic doesn't look like Sherwood Green, at least not on my monitor, and the one he's holding in the video looks more like Ocean Turquoise.
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: gearHed289 on October 27, 2014, 08:19:52 AM
That's a great looking bass, but I've already got my "token Fender" (Geddy Jazz).
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: drbassman on October 27, 2014, 09:58:24 AM
Yep, one j is a like just about any other j bass, but this color and the blocks are very nice!
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Thornton Davis on October 28, 2014, 05:34:45 AM
What's the street price expected to be for this bass?

TD
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Chris P. on October 28, 2014, 07:55:37 AM
I don't even know if it's CS, MIA, MIM, ...
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: dadagoboi on October 28, 2014, 10:14:00 AM
Clayton talks about his influences and gives a tour of the bass.

http://youtu.be/EHGKzT2cfR8

No price or country of origin
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Chris P. on October 28, 2014, 12:44:09 PM
http://www.notreble.com/buzz/2014/10/28/fender-introduces-adam-clayton-signature-jazz-bass/

All specs and the same vid in this link. 1800 dollars.
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Dave W on October 28, 2014, 07:52:30 PM
With that price and the urethane finish, I'd say it's MIA.
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Chris P. on October 29, 2014, 03:27:45 AM
Yes, I guess it's a bit in between the American Standards and the Vintage series.
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: ilan on October 30, 2014, 03:02:02 PM
Blocks without binding... nah.
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: maxschrek on October 30, 2014, 04:06:42 PM
Blocks without binding... nah.

Exactly. Woulda been a deal killer if I had been interested to begin with.
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: gearHed289 on October 31, 2014, 07:59:33 AM
Blocks without binding... nah.

I noticed that too. I kinda like it with rosewood/pearl. Not a huge fan of binding. OTOH, I REALLY dig the black binding/black blocks on the Ged.
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: dadagoboi on October 31, 2014, 08:49:04 AM
That's a '66 clone: blocks, no binding with lollipops.  At least that's faithful to Clayton's original.

The high mass bridge not so much.  I wonder why they didn't use a threaded saddle bridge and clone his pickups if he loves the sound of his original as much as he says he does.
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Bionic-Joe on October 31, 2014, 01:40:45 PM
He has the original Pickup to my Blue '65 T bird II....
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: ilan on November 01, 2014, 08:56:20 AM
That's a '66 clone: blocks, no binding with lollipops
'66 is dots and binding. There never was a blocks without binding period.
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: hieronymous on November 02, 2014, 10:40:11 AM
'66 is dots and binding. There never was a blocks without binding period.
I dig the dots & binding look - Fender Japan had a limited edition '66 Jazz Bass reissue when I was living there around 2005 maybe, was very tempted. I think I could get into the blocks & no binding too - is it even that visible that there isn't binding?
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: ilan on November 02, 2014, 02:55:12 PM
It's visible to the player and that's what counts.
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Thornton Davis on November 04, 2014, 11:33:34 AM
Street price for Adam Clayton Signature Jazz bass in Canada is $1999.50 Cdn. Between Fender and Gibson it seems to me that bass prices are getting out of hand.

TD
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: drbassman on November 04, 2014, 12:26:25 PM
Street price for Adam Clayton Signature Jazz bass in Canada is $1999.50 Cdn. Between Fender and Gibson it seems to me that bass prices are getting out of hand.

TD

I agree!
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Aussie Mark on November 04, 2014, 03:15:24 PM
Shows how much attention I've paid to U2 in recent years.  I assumed Adam Clayton was still playing Gibsons LOL
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Lightyear on November 04, 2014, 07:45:05 PM
Shows how much attention I've paid to U2 in recent years.  I assumed Adam Clayton was still playing Gibsons LOL
I thought he was playing what paid the biggest $$endorsement$$ fees ;D
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: slinkp on November 05, 2014, 07:44:34 AM
I must have blinked and missed when he played Gibsons?. When I was a big U2 fan (hey, it was 1984 and I was 14) he seemed to always have either a Fender Jazz or an Ibanez of some sort, and he seemed to have Fenders every time I'd seen a photo since then.
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: hieronymous on November 05, 2014, 10:28:21 AM
How can you guys forget that he was recently a Warwick endorser?!!!

http://www.warwickbass.com/de/Warwick--Basses-Made-in-Korea--Artist-Serie-Adam-Clayton.html (http://www.warwickbass.com/de/Warwick--Basses-Made-in-Korea--Artist-Serie-Adam-Clayton.html)
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: ilan on November 05, 2014, 12:28:59 PM
That upside down Explorer was hideous. Like Paul Gilbert's upside down Ibanez Iceman. Not every reverse body can be un-reversed.
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Highlander on November 05, 2014, 02:47:14 PM
With one Gibson...

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_nfwzKszAtJE/TNP9-mEK13I/AAAAAAAAH0k/2Q0FsRR3yW4/s1600/adam-clayton-6.jpg)

I also know of him using Les Paul Sig, LP Recording, TBII, TBIV, TBNR, EB2, and a lot of Fenders...
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Aussie Mark on November 05, 2014, 03:17:59 PM
(http://i511.photobucket.com/albums/s357/U2-stage-and-studio/01%20-%20Adam/Adam%20Bass%20Guitars/Gibson/LP_Recording-19xx-white/Gibson-Triumph-Recording_Bass-19-2.jpg)

(http://u2.greensite.sk/images/group/adam_bass/gibson_thunderbird2.jpg)

(http://mixonline.com/photogallery/U2_tour/U2-ADAM-EDGE.jpg)
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Rob on November 05, 2014, 04:45:48 PM
4 Gibsons
 8)
Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: Chris P. on November 06, 2014, 03:53:35 AM
I do like the Warwick Reverso. But like a Fender Bass V it's not pretty seeing it vertically. It looks too strange and fat. But if you strap it on, it looks gorgeous.

Warwick made several basses for Clayton, all custom shop. Several Star Basses, Streamers, Reverso's. Even in the Warwick time, Fender made some very limited Custom Shop basses with Clayton's name. I remember a gold sparkle? I guess like Pete Townshend, with a Rick sig, a lot of Gibson sigs and playing mostly Fender's and Fender amps, those very famous people are 'above' endorsements? Nobody cares if they play more brands?

Title: Re: New Clayton sig
Post by: gearHed289 on November 06, 2014, 09:23:14 AM
That upside down Explorer was hideous. Like Paul Gilbert's upside down Ibanez Iceman. Not every reverse body can be un-reversed.

I actually like the Fireman. I'd like a double neck based on that.  ;D