I think this is still a secret, but Gibson will anounce a new guitar and bass line soon. They bring back all/some the '2012' models as 'Traditional' or something like that, while the new guitars with zero fret and wide neck will go on as 'Performance' series. I don't know any details yet.
Secret or no secret, they'll find a way to screw it up again.
:mrgreen:
Maybe they forget jack inputs this time. Or bend the headstock forwards.
Sales of the 2015 models must have been extremely poor........... :o
Quote from: Chris P. on August 08, 2015, 06:48:10 AM
Maybe they forget jack inputs this time. Or bend the headstock forwards.
Wifi as standard...! :vader:
Quote from: Grog on August 08, 2015, 07:29:14 AM
Sales of the 2015 models must have been extremely poor........... :o
No doubt, this is kind of like that whole "New Coke" thing...........
All the 2015 stuff will be very collectable in 2045.
That soon...?
I've been told by two reliable sources that sales of the 2015 Gibson USA line have been disastrous. I mentioned at the tail end of another thread that they recently introduced two guitar models without the wide neck and zero fret. Still had the GForce though. This was about a month ago.
Now they've just introduced four new "Gibson SR" (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/search?sB=r&Ntt=gibson+sr) models through MF/Guitar Center without the GForce. SR stands for Sprint Run, whatever that means.
They're trying to salvage what they can from this year's disaster. I'll be surprised if they continue with the wide neck and zero fret. The GForce isn't going away but if they have any sense at all it won't be mandatory.
Get their pricing and QC in control and they may sell a few units...
Well, I guess where Gibbie Bass' are concerned, they can rely on at least one regular customer... :vader:
Interesting - the SR models shown at Dave's link are all Les Pauls.
Gibson definitely doesn't strive to diversify its bass offerings.
Quote from: Pilgrim on August 09, 2015, 09:31:40 AM
Interesting - the SR models shown at Dave's link are all Les Pauls.
Gibson definitely doesn't strive to diversify its bass offerings.
Those four LPs are still 2015 models. And no doubt they're being issued to try to get some sales from people who rejected all the 2015 changes. Thankfully the basses never had the changes.
It's not too late to hope for more bass offerings for 2016. Don't hold your breath, though.
http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/2015/08/08/gibson-brands-electronics-first-guitars-second/31165805/ (http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/2015/08/08/gibson-brands-electronics-first-guitars-second/31165805/)
That explains a lot. I had no idea that Gibson owned those electronics companies, but they evidently provide a revenue stream that's the main support for the company.
Gibson can afford to mess up its guitar business to some degree and not lose the house on it. The side note in there about their application to trademark the 335 guitar is interesting. If Fender couldn't manage it with the Strat, I doubt Gibson will make it with the 335. Both have been copied endlessly.
Quote from: Pilgrim on August 09, 2015, 03:13:42 PM
That explains a lot. I had no idea that Gibson owned those electronics companies, but they evidently provide a revenue stream that's the main support for the company.
Gibson can afford to mess up its guitar business to some degree and not lose the house on it. The side note in there about their application to trademark the 335 guitar is interesting. If Fender couldn't manage it with the Strat, I doubt Gibson will make it with the 335. Both have been copied endlessly.
You have to understand that this is a puff piece by the local paper. Its purpose is to make Gibson look good, especially in the face of all the bashing Henry has taken elsewhere. The electronics acquisitions are old news, I've mentioned most of them before here (e.g. the Gibson/TEAC Memory cable). They have controlling interest in TEAC/Tascam, not outright ownership, and IIRC most of the others are that way too.
No, they don't rely on the guitar business alone, but the company has been built on the reputation of Gibson guitars. If you piss away that reputation, the other electronics businesses may survive and even thrive, but no one will buy just because they're part of the Gibson family. Some folks may even avoid them in that case.
The company is finding out the hard way what happens when you force unwanted changes on your customer base. It's backfired terribly, and worse yet, many of those who bought anyway have found that the "improvements" don't work, e.g. problems with the zero fret nut and GForce. The only question now is whether Henry will see the handwriting on the wall.
Do I collect for zero frets? ??? :-\
Quote from: uwe on August 10, 2015, 11:06:03 AM
Do I collect for zero frets? ??? :-\
Wait for the closeout sales. Then you won't feel bad about owning a Les Paul that can't tune itself but won't let you and has a nut made of a brass alloy so soft that guitar strings slice through it like cheese.
Gibson-branded studio monitors (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-audio/gibson-les-paul-6-studio-monitor-lp6) are already showing up in music retail. They, like their guitars, are priced double what they should be. I supposed the faux flame maple fronts are what drove the price so high since they can no longer illegally buy black market printed mdf in bulk. :mrgreen:
Quote from: uwe on August 10, 2015, 11:06:03 AM
Do I collect for zero frets? ??? :-\
I think you could safely argue the case, but when a collector is as completest as you, where do you draw the line...?
I don't think you'll have a problem acquiring one of these, so go with PBG's suggestion... ;)
Quote from: uwe on August 10, 2015, 11:06:03 AM
Do I collect for zero frets? ??? :-\
No, but you should collect for jack position, as we discussed in another thread. ;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mK6S5ydeBMk
Quote from: Psycho Bass Guy on August 10, 2015, 01:33:46 PM
Gibson-branded studio monitors (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-audio/gibson-les-paul-6-studio-monitor-lp6) are already showing up in music retail. They, like their guitars, are priced double what they should be. I supposed the faux flame maple fronts are what drove the price so high since they can no longer illegally buy black market printed mdf in bulk. :mrgreen:
Those have been around for a while. First saw them in some guy's NAMM vlog report. Immediately struck me as a double face palm, but they will have their market.