The Last Bass Outpost

Gear Discussion Forums => Gibson Basses => Topic started by: uwe on February 20, 2013, 06:43:41 AM

Title: Doesn't strictly belong here ...
Post by: uwe on February 20, 2013, 06:43:41 AM
... but it's a nice commemoration for Ray Dietrich's lasting vision and we'll all just replace "Thunder-" for "Fire...", ok?

http://www2.gibson.com/News-Lifestyle/Features/en-us/Gibson-Firebird-The-Birth-of-a-Tone-Machine.aspx

My son loves his rank and file Firebird over his Custom Shop LP and the Floyd Rose Explorer grinding machine. He also plays nicest (and funkiest) with it.
Title: Re: Doesn't strictly belong here ...
Post by: Denis on February 20, 2013, 07:42:09 AM
That Firebird X is fugly! But I know it's not the guitar's own fault...
Title: Re: Doesn't strictly belong here ...
Post by: uwe on February 20, 2013, 12:27:59 PM
I have to say, it grows on me ... that fin is garish (but created by the Nashville flood, so it's a nice inside joke), the maple board not really within the family, but I can't say that anything the guy plays with it sounds bad (not that he plays a lot with it!). I'd give a bass like that a try, probably nice for doodling things at home, writing songs, getting inspiration. Toys can sometimes do that for you.
Title: Re: Doesn't strictly belong here ...
Post by: Psycho Bass Guy on February 20, 2013, 09:55:44 PM
The Firebird X looks WAY more like a PRS with a broken and improperly healed hip than an actual member of the 'Bird family. Headstocks matter.
Title: Re: Doesn't strictly belong here ...
Post by: uwe on February 21, 2013, 06:51:18 AM
The headstock is unfortunate, true, and probably an evil nod of Henry J. to PRS indeed!  :mrgreen: