The Last Bass Outpost

Main Forums => The Outpost Cafe => Topic started by: ack1961 on December 19, 2012, 04:16:50 PM

Title: Classic thread response
Post by: ack1961 on December 19, 2012, 04:16:50 PM
I normally don't do this, but the response to this thread on TB is just awesome.
You can stop reading at response #10

http://www.talkbass.com/forum/f38/reggie-hamilton-bass-hate-tone-940746/

Good Karma
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: Denis on December 19, 2012, 04:27:12 PM
 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: TBird1958 on December 19, 2012, 04:31:48 PM


It just needs a "tort" gard...................  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: Highlander on December 19, 2012, 05:12:16 PM
Chuckling from the UK...
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: chromium on December 19, 2012, 05:15:00 PM
Quote from: ack1961 on December 19, 2012, 04:16:50 PM
response #10

;D

I suspect if the tort guard doesn't help, the problem is in the distal phalanx  ;)
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: ack1961 on December 19, 2012, 05:36:16 PM
Quote from: TBird1958 on December 19, 2012, 04:31:48 PM

It just needs a "tort" gard...................  :rolleyes:

that's got to be the answer - I'm sure Reggie expressed that in a PM to the OP.
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: Dave W on December 19, 2012, 05:37:28 PM
Gotta love it.  :)  Wonder if he'll come back to the thread.

He says he's a Fender guy but if he thinks a passive p/j setup with a switchable active preamp is a "super modern" sound, then I doubt it.

It probably just needs a new strap.  :P   Yeah, that's the ticket.
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: Pilgrim on December 19, 2012, 06:57:45 PM
I bet he's running scared and won't reply to Hamilton.

Note also that his join date is December...it's probably his first, most ignorant post.
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: ack1961 on December 20, 2012, 04:39:59 AM
Quote from: Pilgrim on December 19, 2012, 06:57:45 PM
I bet he's running scared and won't reply to Hamilton.

Note also that his join date is December...it's probably his first, most ignorant post.

I'm laying odds that he can out-ignorant himself in no time - he's certainly in the right place.
I love his first comment "sounds great", but it's entitled "hate the tone"
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: Dave W on December 20, 2012, 08:47:19 AM
Those are his only two posts.

Quote from: ack1961 on December 20, 2012, 04:39:59 AM
....
I love his first comment "sounds great", but it's entitled "hate the tone"

That fits in very well with being a Fender guy who doesn't like the tone of a Fender.
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: gweimer on December 20, 2012, 10:55:57 AM
Quote from: Dave W on December 20, 2012, 08:47:19 AM
Those are his only two posts.

That fits in very well with being a Fender guy who doesn't like the tone of a Fender.

I think we can help him.

(http://www.mikelull.com/images/basses/jt4/03-gallery.jpg)
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: ack1961 on December 20, 2012, 02:09:58 PM
Quote from: gweimer on December 20, 2012, 10:55:57 AM
I think we can help him.

(http://www.mikelull.com/images/basses/jt4/03-gallery.jpg)

what's the weight?
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: ack1961 on December 20, 2012, 02:11:18 PM
Quote from: ack1961 on December 20, 2012, 02:09:58 PM
what's the weight?

by the way, that (^) was painful to write, even in jest.
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: uwe on December 22, 2012, 09:53:04 AM
Reggie H., the alleged LaBella endorser, only plays Fender strings (made by D'Addario) except on his double bass and ABG. You live and learn. Of course, with a Fender signature model named after you, a Fender string endorsement won't earn you anything.
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: TBird1958 on December 22, 2012, 09:58:15 AM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are a character  ;D

I really wish you'd post on TB sometimes............Your wit really is extraordinary. 
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: uwe on December 22, 2012, 10:46:22 AM
They'd stone me there!

Speaking of you, I walked past Sam Ash in NYC last night and they had about a dozen Gibson and Epi Basses up on the wall - the G-3 and the new Epi TBird Classic Pro among them. Seeing it in real life, the slightly off-set cutaway is far more prominent than on pictures, but it's not a bad visual result. Why the hell did no-one think of it before?
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: Highlander on December 22, 2012, 11:02:28 AM
Que Scott... enter stage right... ;D
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: TBird1958 on December 22, 2012, 12:38:46 PM
Quote from: uwe on December 22, 2012, 10:46:22 AM
They'd stone me there!

Speaking of you, I walked past Sam Ash in NYC last night and they had about a dozen Gibson and Epi Basses up on the wall - the G-3 and the new Epi TBird Classic Pro among them. Seeing it in real life, the slightly off-set cutaway is far more prominent than on pictures, but it's not a bad visual result. Why the hell did no-one think of it before?

I'll admit it's a *solution* and a relatively graceful one at that, in a side-by-side comparison I still much prefer Gibson's shape. But, and I'll freely admit this, I don't spend much time playing past the 12th fret. Why pervert a beautiful thing  ;)


TB could use your wit!
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: OldManC on December 22, 2012, 01:16:38 PM
Quote from: TBird1958 on December 22, 2012, 12:38:46 PM
Why pervert a beautiful thing  ;)

The ONLY time you'll ever see those words under that byline.  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: TBird1958 on December 22, 2012, 02:57:23 PM
Quote from: OldManC on December 22, 2012, 01:16:38 PM
The ONLY time you'll ever see those words under that byline.  :mrgreen:


Touche Sir!   ;D
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: Pilgrim on December 23, 2012, 07:20:43 AM
Quote from: uwe on December 22, 2012, 10:46:22 AM
They'd stone me there!


Only because half of them (the half under 19) are so young and poorly read they're incapable of understanding what "wit" is.
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: Highlander on December 23, 2012, 05:09:57 PM
Nonsense... Ev'body knows coffee's bet-er wit sugar... ;D
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: Dave W on December 23, 2012, 09:53:45 PM
Quote from: Pilgrim on December 23, 2012, 07:20:43 AM
Only because half of them (the half under 19) are so young and poorly read they're incapable of understanding what "wit" is.

Those are the half-wits.

OTOH there's no age limit on being satire-impaired.
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: Highlander on December 25, 2012, 06:16:16 PM
 :P ;)
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: uwe on December 26, 2012, 06:53:15 PM
I hate all three: satire, irony & sarcasm.
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: exiledarchangel on December 27, 2012, 03:38:42 AM
Quote from: uwe on December 26, 2012, 06:53:15 PM
I hate all three: satire, irony & sarcasm.

Yea, right. And I hate fruits.

(http://bananaenvy.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/two_girls_one_banana.jpg)
Title: Re: Classic thread response
Post by: Pilgrim on December 27, 2012, 07:59:28 AM
Quote from: exiledarchangel on December 27, 2012, 03:38:42 AM
Yea, right. And I hate fruits.


I've always admired how healthy your diet must be with all that fruit around.