Author Topic: Gibson SB350 Bass  (Read 8867 times)

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21452
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
Re: Gibson SB350 Bass
« Reply #15 on: October 14, 2008, 06:13:34 AM »
says the man that kollected all 4 variations  :mrgreen:

Just trying to fend off competition from "my" market!!!
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

Dave W

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 22247
  • Got time to breathe, got time for music
    • View Profile
Re: Gibson SB350 Bass
« Reply #16 on: October 14, 2008, 08:43:56 AM »
I don't see why a set neck SG shape bass with alder body and maple neck should automatically sound "deader" than an all maho EB with a pup (or a maho body one with a maple neck) that only picks up the bottom quarter of the frequency spectrum anyway.

It was a tough assignment, but Gibson managed to pull it off.  ;)

Those Melody Maker pickups sure had plenty of top end in a guitar.

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21452
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
Re: Gibson SB350 Bass
« Reply #17 on: October 14, 2008, 10:57:27 AM »
But the Melody Maker guitar pups don't sound thin at all on the SB 300 and 400 models - thanks to the positioning right behind the neck and in the middle of the body. If anything they have more ooomph than the later humbuckers of the SB 350/450 series (those offered more midbite though).

But I see defending the SB series is a lost cause with you!  8)
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

Dave W

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 22247
  • Got time to breathe, got time for music
    • View Profile
Re: Gibson SB350 Bass
« Reply #18 on: October 14, 2008, 11:52:19 AM »
I didn't say they sounded thin. I was just countering what you said about them only picking up the bottom quarter of the frequency spectrum.

Lost cause? You never know, I might someday find an SB300 with magic tone and buy it. Until then, I can only go by the few SB series I've heard and played.

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21452
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
Re: Gibson SB350 Bass
« Reply #19 on: October 14, 2008, 12:11:34 PM »
"I don't see why a set neck SG shape bass with alder body and maple neck should automatically sound "deader" than an all maho EB with a pup (or a maho body one with a maple neck) that only picks up the bottom quarter of the frequency spectrum anyway."

With all due respect, Herr Moderator, that "with a pup" was referring to the mudbucker EBs come with not the Melody Maker guitar pups of the 300/400 or the humbuckers of the 350/450 series!!! The latter pups pick up the full frequency spectrum nicely, in fact the charm of the 300/400 series is the purity and eveness of the single coil all across the bass' frequency spectrum. Solely the mudbucker is the frequency bottom dweller.
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

Dave W

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 22247
  • Got time to breathe, got time for music
    • View Profile
Re: Gibson SB350 Bass
« Reply #20 on: October 14, 2008, 12:14:51 PM »
Sorry. Your explanation was muddy.  ;D

P.S. I do like the single coils of the SB300/400 better than the SB350/450 buckers. But that's not saying much.

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21452
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
Re: Gibson SB350 Bass
« Reply #21 on: October 15, 2008, 03:19:34 AM »
Sorry. Your explanation was muddy.  ;D

That excuse sounds dead to me.  :-*
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...