It amazes me how someone always up in defense for the abysmally misengineered two-point ("only has a stringholder missing") can pour so much derision of the much improved three-point!!! The three-point is the iconic, idiosyncratic Gibson bass bridge, as much a part of the design for the last 40 years as the Ric bridge is on a 4001/4003.
And since adding a stringholder to a bridge that never had one seems to be allowed to argue its (then) practicability: If someone came up with saddles for a 3-point that could be individually raised and lowered by, say, two allen screws in the saddle, the thing would be darn near perfect even for today's standards.
Death to all false bridges!!!