Author Topic: A flats vs rounds comparison  (Read 3430 times)

Grog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1566
  • Low Impedance LP's
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #15 on: June 01, 2020, 01:19:34 PM »
The Memphis ES Les Paul Bass came from the factory with flat wounds. The only new bass I’ve bought that was shipped with them.
There's no such thing as gravity, the earth just sucks!!

Dave W

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 22251
  • Got time to breathe, got time for music
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #16 on: June 01, 2020, 11:08:04 PM »
My Vox Spyder came with tapewounds. It was made in '68 and I bought it new in '69. It was an Eko-made bass and Eko sold strings under their own name so I'd guess that was the brand. I never changed them the whole time I owned the bass.

Grog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1566
  • Low Impedance LP's
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #17 on: June 02, 2020, 07:11:16 AM »
I’m not sure if the Tape Wounds are any good anymore, but here is a batch of never used Gibson bass strings. (1) Tape Wound, (1) Flat Wound & (1) Round Wound.....

There's no such thing as gravity, the earth just sucks!!

Dave W

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 22251
  • Got time to breathe, got time for music
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #18 on: June 02, 2020, 09:48:18 PM »
Good price for 1998! Why wouldn't the tapewounds be good? The nylon wrap shouldn't deteriorate.

Grog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1566
  • Low Impedance LP's
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #19 on: June 03, 2020, 07:22:30 AM »
They must have sat in the store for 25 years. I offered them $10 a pack & they were happy to let them go..... They also had NOS Ripper/Grabber cases in stock at the time.

Nylon coating still looks as new!


« Last Edit: June 03, 2020, 09:40:04 AM by Grog »
There's no such thing as gravity, the earth just sucks!!

Dave W

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 22251
  • Got time to breathe, got time for music
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #20 on: June 03, 2020, 11:03:26 PM »
As I suspected!

I'm surprised Groth had anything around that long. Old stock was the province of Torp's in St.Paul and Suneson's on E. Lake Street.

ilan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3903
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #21 on: June 04, 2020, 10:34:29 PM »
Tapewounds often necessitate widening the nut slots, something I don't want to perform on a vintage bass.
The guy who bought the same bass twice — first in 1977 and again in 2023

Dave W

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 22251
  • Got time to breathe, got time for music
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #22 on: June 05, 2020, 09:58:40 PM »
Tapewounds often necessitate widening the nut slots, something I don't want to perform on a vintage bass.

I've never had to widen a nut slot for tapewounds, the nylon wrap has compressed enough without binding in the slot.

patman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1348
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #23 on: June 08, 2020, 12:48:47 PM »
D'addario's and GHS are normal gauges

Grog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1566
  • Low Impedance LP's
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #24 on: June 08, 2020, 05:33:30 PM »
The NOS Gibson strings seem to be extra light gauge. .091 E string......
There's no such thing as gravity, the earth just sucks!!

Dave W

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 22251
  • Got time to breathe, got time for music
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #25 on: June 08, 2020, 08:39:05 PM »
The NOS Gibson strings seem to be extra light gauge. .091 E string......

You mentioned that these were years old when you bought them. Back in the 70s, they were probably the only flatwound set Gibson offered.

Bubbalou88

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #26 on: July 06, 2020, 04:40:23 AM »
I have been very happy with TI Jazz Flats and LaBella Low Tension Flats (little more tension than TI's but less than most others)
CEO of Retired

Bubbalou88

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #27 on: July 08, 2020, 03:54:47 AM »
For the most part I use TI Jazz Flats or LaBella Low tension flats( little higher tension than the TI’s)
For rounds I like DR Silver Stars or Black Beauties ( both are thin coated) for less Finger to string noise . If you use a coated string I recommend top loading only as the feed thru the body string ferrules are not typically grounded and might pick up noise
« Last Edit: July 08, 2020, 04:16:02 AM by Bubbalou88 »
CEO of Retired

tore00

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
  • Southern by grace of God
    • View Profile
    • Snakebite
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #28 on: July 08, 2020, 08:44:06 AM »
I've a 1967 Guild Starfire and I stringed initially with Thomastick flats. No sustain, maybe because of the high magnetic field of the bisonic pickup. I tried to lower the poles, but no luck. I changed to roundwound and she plays beautiful. Deep, resonant, a great bass. I presented her in this post
http://bassoutpost.com/index.php?topic=10154.15
Maker of the Bad-Sonic Pickups

Bubbalou88

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
    • View Profile
Re: A flats vs rounds comparison
« Reply #29 on: July 14, 2020, 01:14:01 AM »
Yep, it is amazing how a string works well on one bass or guitar and not another mostly due to pickup characteristics!
CEO of Retired