Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Granny Gremlin

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 194
46
Bass Amps & Effects / Re: The Evolution of Bass Amplication
« on: December 09, 2021, 03:02:17 PM »
I don't know how they can completely ignore Sunn in this story - instead giving Ampeg the credit for finally achieving enough power in a tube amp (and saying the B-15 did it - it didn't - that's a pretty low power amp that was a studio staple not so much live).  This was the reason Sunn Amps was created - the first one was built for Conrad's brother (bassist in The Kingsmen) who complained about lack of power.  It grew into a proper company when other players noticed and wanted one too.

Also trying to compare a Class D amp to a tube amp merely in terms of wattage spec and weight is hilarious and demonstrates a complete lack of knowledge re the strengths and weaknesses of both.  I'm no solid state hater but that's apples and oranges.

47
Gibson Basses / Re: Les Paul Bass (low impedance PUs) question
« on: December 09, 2021, 08:14:06 AM »
That defeats the purpose a bit, no?  And why a DI - you don't need the level conversion (in either direction if passive) and may as well use a HiZ bass at that point.  If anything a passive splitter/isolation box (1:1 transformer vs 4:1) is the ticket.

Anyway it's worth trying just with a TS-XLR adapter cable, it just may not always be ideal depending on how the given preamp handles the differential input.  In many cases it will be a simple matter of a -6db drop in volume, which, given the relative signal strength of the pickup vs a typical microphone, should not be an issue - just compensate with more gain. But sometimes it can be a bit more than just that - hum (the adapter ties pin 3, -ve signal or 'cold,' to pin 1, ground) or even affecting the tone.  I am splitting a bit of a hair here, but just so it's not a surprise and knowing what the fix would be - could be as easy as trying a different preamp.

48
Gibson Basses / Re: Les Paul Bass (low impedance PUs) question
« on: December 09, 2021, 06:21:52 AM »
It's not that easy though - it's LoZ AND unbalanced.  What input device has that combination these days (or ever - that was never a common thing)?  Then again, a cheap 1:1 transformer to DIY a passive balancing device to allow worry-free input into an XLR mic jack is only a coupla bux.  Just using a 1/4" TS to XLR adapter cable will not always have great results depending on the mic preamp you're going into.  And you do need a mic preamp - can't juist go into a line input.  Many interfaces have XLR/TS combo jacks where the TS jack is hard wired to the HiZ  input (vs older consoles where either the XLR or TRS can be switched between mic and line).

The best most hifi hobbit sound I've ever had is using the LoZ out into the LoZ unbalanced input on my Bogen PA head.  The main difference being smoothness of output as regards resonances....  incidentally that Bogen has a 600Ohm tap on the output transformer so I think I can use it as a mic preamp into a line level recording device.

Actually, if you re-read the original post I wrote '70 not '70s.... :mrgreen:

Well I'll be a drunken sailor.


49
Gibson Basses / Re: Les Paul Bass (low impedance PUs) question
« on: December 08, 2021, 06:57:50 PM »
OK, fair enough, but like, decades are merely a journalistic convenience, maaaaan. 

I just assumed, because no specific year was... um... specified, that 70s  would be a Triumph and 60s would be an LPB (you know, like "60s spec" doesn't mean made in the 60s, because manufacturers never started and stopped things exactly on decade turnovers.... boy would that have been convenient).

Anyway, adapter or no you'll enjoy it.

To be clear about the situation - it is in no way dangerous for instrument or amp (a lower Z input is to a higher Z amp is always better as regards that sort of thing - that's why amp inputs are 1M when pickups are usually only 7-18k, mudbuckers excepted of coarse.... but then again, even a mere 30K makes those tube preamps work much harder than they want to).

50
So as per the LP bass vid thread I saw a pic on social media of these guys with a red Victory Standard and had to go find a vid to post.  Due to appropriate punk production values it's really hard to see but there's finally a bit at about 4:40.  Headstock then body shape and a glint of red highlight.  What you can't see is the large patch of finish wear to the bear wood on the lower bout that I could see in the pic.



Anyway, seems Greg Norton had a Gibson bass phase that overlapped with Mould's  Flying V phase (see the LP vid thread).

51
Gibson Basses / Re: Music videos that feature Gibson Les Paul basses...
« on: December 08, 2021, 06:30:12 PM »
So I saw a pic of Husker Du using a Victory bass (candy apple red with heavy wear) so went to go look for a vid of that show for the fat bottom girls thread, but instead found this (also nicely prominent bassline with heavy flanging and/or envelope filter):



Can't tell if a copy (can't seem to get a good pause of the headstock or bridge) but if it is it's one of the better ones.

52
Gibson Basses / Re: Les Paul Bass (low impedance PUs) question
« on: December 08, 2021, 06:22:50 PM »
But guys, a 70s LP has the Z transformer built in - just hit the switch.

If not, then it's a 60s one.

Anyway, I agree - if plugging into an amp direct, then no worries.  But if you're using pedals it's best to get the adapter or you may have an insane volume difference between on and bypass (and not in a useful way).  If true bypass and all your pedals have output level controls then you can compensate for it, but if any single pedal in the chain is buffered (or no level control) you're boned.

53
The Outpost Cafe / Re: Remodeling your bathroom?
« on: November 27, 2021, 01:50:05 PM »
Doesn't even look like Lars Ulrich.
More like a fan.
And a eunuch...

No judgement, but would you prefer it if the toilet was anatomically correct (and standing at attention perhaps).  Hey, it's cool; no judgement. You just do you.

Personally, I find the most disturbing part that there is no way to attach a seat.

54
The Outpost Cafe / Re: The day before Thanksgiving...
« on: November 26, 2021, 02:58:47 PM »
Don't forget the mashed potatoes and gravy.





(features backups by Debbie Harry)

55
The Bass Zone / Re: Most influential basses
« on: November 25, 2021, 05:21:11 PM »
I really don't understand the Mustang on that list.  Not that popular at all - then or now (more now, but still - it's what people get when they want a P but fear the long scale).  Likewise both the V and VI?  I'd say loose the V - esoteric.

Shergold Marathon 6 - really?  Y'all know I'm a JD/NO fan but 1 star player does not an influential bass make.

I love LoZ Gibsons, but again, not that influential.  Nobody else even picked up on the pickup design.

Aristides - ok do you want influential or interesting, because sure it's nerdworthy but I dunno about influential.

If you're including a Dano, better be a longhorn (sure they had the first VI, but the only person that influenced was maybe Leo Fender).

And I hope your list wasn't in any sort of order.

You may also want to consider the EB1, sure it didn't pan out but it was the 2nd to market, first with a set neck, shape begat the Hofner, and the sidewinder pickup design carried through to not just subsequent Gibson bass models, but influenced their guitar pickups too.  Also unique (first anyway - someone else did this later but forget who) with the vertical playing a la double bass with the telescopic leg.  Also set the standard for short scale length.

Wal might make the list - very popular for a time.... but then you might have to include the Gibson EB4 because they totally copped the pickup design, though it was more successful when Wal did it.

In addition to Alembic being the first boutique bass, it also popularised active electronics and dummy coils.

Oh - BC Rich (Mockingbird or whatever) - enter the pointy era and picked up where Alembic left off with active electronics. 

56
Gibson Basses / Re: Music videos that feature Thunderbirds
« on: November 25, 2021, 04:43:32 PM »
At that time, what else could it be?  I guess I've seen lawsuit era copies but not many of an NR.

57
Gibson Basses / Re: Music videos that feature Thunderbirds
« on: November 05, 2021, 07:14:38 AM »
 
 Love Midnight Oil  one of the few bands of the 90s worth listening to.

Perhaps because they're an 80s band. :P  Beds are Burning was released in 87 and that was from their 5th or 6th album.  The 90s was a really bad time for the radio - there was good stuff being put out just not so much on mainstream stations.

Anyway their first album was 1978.  This is them performing their first single in 81.  Bit more spazz punk back then:


58
Bass Amps & Effects / Re: I built myself a combo
« on: October 26, 2021, 11:11:09 AM »
Pretty cool.  A bud and I are looking into making some transmission line cabs, the problem right now is the CAD.

59
The Outpost Cafe / Re: So, what have you been listening to lately?
« on: October 26, 2021, 11:05:21 AM »
Ample proof how a - at the time: a little chubby - Herr Bolan and T. Rex were not just a pop band, but also a rock band (and punk progenitors). Who says the drugs don't work?  8)



well, you can tell that's actually live.  I'll have what the backup singers (and soundman) are having.

60
The Outpost Cafe / Re: So, what have you been listening to lately?
« on: October 21, 2021, 04:45:35 PM »
Aerosmith turned it into a rock number. Nothing wrong with that, it is what they set out (and were paid) to do. I still love Tyler's comment re the "Rolling Stones copycats" allegations against Aerosmith in the 70ies: "We never copied the Stones, we both just stole from the same people!" Priceless. 8) BTW, here's your 'screech', Jake:



Say what you will about Aerosmith, one thing they never ever lacked: groove (among white hard rock bands they are way up there as regards that). Also a testament why I prefer Brad Whitford's solos to Joe Perry's.

For more traditional-minded folks:



This is nicely groovy unless you hate the Tower of Power treatment they gave it:



LOL, I don't not like it because they rocked it up, I just don't like the treatment.  That later live version is better (Tyler backs off the screech a bit - probably has to due to it being lower, but yeah, it's there) but still not gonna be my favorite version. 

Love that quote though.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 194