The Last Bass Outpost

Gear Discussion Forums => Guitars Etc. => Topic started by: sniper on September 05, 2010, 02:16:08 PM

Title: guitar body wood
Post by: sniper on September 05, 2010, 02:16:08 PM
i ran across an interesting photo of a new Gibson robot body. it definately looks like a ply body to me after looking at the control cavity laminations. can someone elaborate?
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Freuds_Cat on September 05, 2010, 05:55:27 PM
Could it be the router bit making those lines?
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: sniper on September 05, 2010, 07:07:18 PM
Could it be the router bit making those lines?

thats foods for thought. i was wondering how widespread is using plywood with veneers in the guitar industry.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: dadagoboi on September 05, 2010, 11:44:34 PM
Could it be the router bit making those lines?
Highly unlikely.  Pretty sure that's plywood.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Freuds_Cat on September 06, 2010, 12:05:48 AM
Yeah, I'm not convinced either, just offering a possible alternative. I have an Epi EB that IS plywood.

(http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t253/Freuds_cat/Epiphone%20EB-X/RIMG0332.jpg)

(http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t253/Freuds_cat/Epiphone%20EB-X/RIMG0333.jpg)

Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: exiledarchangel on September 06, 2010, 12:46:40 AM
Is that an EB0 that you added a bridge pickup?
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Freuds_Cat on September 06, 2010, 03:33:21 AM
Give the man a cigar  ;)
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: nofi on September 06, 2010, 05:34:24 AM
compressed cardboard, the new tone 'wood'. ;)
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: dadagoboi on September 06, 2010, 05:47:17 AM
compressed cardboard, the new tone 'wood'. ;)

Not so new.  DANELECTRO
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Basvarken on September 06, 2010, 06:21:44 AM
Ah what the heck. People don't buy a Robot Guitar for the tone.  :P
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Freuds_Cat on September 06, 2010, 06:23:20 AM
Thats true re Danelectro but I was surprised to see an Epi made from Ply. Even more so a Gibson, if thats what the Robot is made from.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Freuds_Cat on September 06, 2010, 06:24:29 AM
Robs next project is going to be a ply Hobbit!   :P ;D ;)
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Dave W on September 06, 2010, 07:05:05 AM
I've seen marks like that from industrial cutters. It doesn't look like plywood at all. You can't see alternating veneer layers like you can on the Epi.

Gibson's specs are solid mahogany on the SG Robot and mahogany body, maple top on the LP Robot. That's pretty clear to me.

Epi used plywood for many years, they didn't advertise it but it was no secret.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: dadagoboi on September 06, 2010, 07:42:53 AM
on reexamination, I think you're right, Dave.  They must use a smoother bit to do the cover route and finish the shallower cavity, is that for a battery?
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Pilgrim on September 06, 2010, 08:39:16 AM
I'm not convinced that a good, solid laminate is a drawback in a solid body.  My Lotus fretless is a laminate and it sounds great.  Gibson's color-laminate SG-series uses layers as well.

I haven't done side-by-side tests of basses with different body woods with identical electronics and strings, which is what it would take for me to be convinced.  My current belief is that if wood makes a difference (not saying it doesn't, but also not saying that if there's a difference, that it is a drawback), electronics and strings make a lot MORE difference.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Dave W on September 06, 2010, 02:04:16 PM
on reexamination, I think you're right, Dave.  They must use a smoother bit to do the cover route and finish the shallower cavity, is that for a battery?

Specs say it comes with a rechargeable battery pack, I don't know where it's located. Smoother area may just be coated with conductive paint under the finish.


... I haven't done side-by-side tests of basses with different body woods with identical electronics and strings, which is what it would take for me to be convinced.  My current belief is that if wood makes a difference (not saying it doesn't, but also not saying that if there's a difference, that it is a drawback), electronics and strings make a lot MORE difference.

Compare these guitars unplugged: LP Standard, LP Studio (thinner maple top) and one of the all-mahohany LP variants. Same body size, same mahogany neck. You should be able to easily hear the differences in body woods.

May not be as obvious plugged in, still everything affects tone in some way. How much is hard to say. Different woods absorb or enhance different frequencies.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Freuds_Cat on September 06, 2010, 03:57:06 PM
who is it here that says "the sound is in the glue?"  ;D
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: sniper on September 06, 2010, 04:14:08 PM
tone ply? lol. the thing that got me in the pic is that i thought i saw grain in the bottom of the control cavity without many if any at all mill marks like i would see if it were capped with a "true or real" wood vs being routed out of a solid piece of wood.

my Chinese Epi EBO is ply but ply what?
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Pilgrim on September 06, 2010, 09:09:54 PM

May not be as obvious plugged in, still everything affects tone in some way. How much is hard to say. Different woods absorb or enhance different frequencies.

I won't argue with that...including the assertion that it's hard to say.

One argument one could make about a high quality laminate is that many folks seem to perfer bodies made from denser, heavier woods.  Seems to me like the resins holding laminates together lead to a similar density in the body.  Perhaps the issue is whether that density would be resonant, or would deaden the sound.  Dave's unplugged test would probably be a good way to find an answer.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Freuds_Cat on September 06, 2010, 10:19:35 PM
I guess you can go through the stages like:

1. solid plank
2. Laminated smaller planks
3. Plywood
4. Resin/fibre based instruments

To be honest I've heard each of these methods sound both good and bad depending on the instrument itself.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: exiledarchangel on September 07, 2010, 01:06:46 AM
If you play loud and fast, wear silly clothes onstage and got lots of groupies and cocaine, wood doesn't matter.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Pilgrim on September 07, 2010, 05:48:00 AM
If you play loud and fast, wear silly clothes onstage and got lots of groupies and cocaine, wood doesn't matter.

Well, maybe to the groupies.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: exiledarchangel on September 07, 2010, 10:27:36 AM
Well, maybe to the groupies.

Ofcourse, Your Naughtyness! :D
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: dadagoboi on September 07, 2010, 11:02:58 AM
'Wood" certainly does matter to the groupies ;)
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: ack1961 on September 07, 2010, 11:18:28 AM
I'm not convinced that a good, solid laminate is a drawback in a solid body.  My Lotus fretless is a laminate and it sounds great.  Gibson's color-laminate SG-series uses layers as well.

I haven't done side-by-side tests of basses with different body woods with identical electronics and strings, which is what it would take for me to be convinced.  My current belief is that if wood makes a difference (not saying it doesn't, but also not saying that if there's a difference, that it is a drawback), electronics and strings make a lot MORE difference.

That Electromatic is plywood and it sounds pretty awesome.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: dadagoboi on September 07, 2010, 12:07:19 PM
That Electromatic is plywood and it sounds pretty awesome.

My StratoBaster is really crappy plywood, maybe Luan, and sounds a lot better than my OLP Stingray.  Must be the cocaine or the silly clothes.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Pilgrim on September 07, 2010, 04:47:33 PM
My fretless is (probably) a Lotus originally, and I know from refinishing it that the body is laminate.  Sounds great.

As Dave says, a laminate body probably sounds minutely different - but IMO, not to its detriment.  Different does not mean bad.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Dave W on September 07, 2010, 07:41:02 PM
Remember most thinline hollow and semihollow electrics are laminated, with the notable exception of Rickenbacker. Sure, a Gibson ES-335 or EB-2 will be a higher grade laminate, probably lumber core, and with a high appearance grade top. But it's still a laminate.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: Electro Dale on December 30, 2010, 11:07:55 AM

Here's some FYI
The Guitar and Bass body routing is done on a CNC machine in 1 pass with a spiraled up-cut router bit that has multi cutting sections of carbide on each flute.  This is done for a faster production method.  Fender, Rickenbacker, Gibson and Epiphone all use this CNC cutting method and doing it this way it leaves those small groves that appear to be laminations giving the viual appearance of plywood.
Your Robo guitar is solid Mahogany with a Maple cap it just looks like plywood.
There are plywood bodied guitars, mostly inexpensive Chinese or Korean ones that can also be semi hollow.
Title: Re: guitar body wood
Post by: dadagoboi on December 30, 2010, 11:43:56 AM
Thanks, Dale!