Gear Discussion Forums > Gibson Basses

L.A. Times puff piece on Gibson

<< < (2/3) > >>

westen44:
Something else from the L.A. Times--a very brief Gibson video.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/music/93732676-132.html

doombass:
Henry J equals less sales with not enough marketing dollars. That would mean more marketing dollars equals more convinced customers buying crappy, ugly products containing unwanted technology?  :o

So if this does'nt simply do it (well it does but not for sales, just blindness):


More marketing will?

chromium:
If only he had funded a marketing campaign with a sample group of millennial consumers who get asked to describe the Fireturd X using emojis...  ;D

Dave W:

--- Quote from: westen44 on June 17, 2017, 04:37:50 PM ---Something else from the L.A. Times--a very brief Gibson video.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/music/93732676-132.html

--- End quote ---

$3 billion a year? According to the Music Trades (industry mag), Gibson's estimated 2016 revenue was about $1.6 billion. That includes all the non-guitar related subsidiaries. Henry wouldn't exaggerate, would he?


--- Quote from: chromium on June 18, 2017, 08:27:25 PM ---If only he had funded a marketing campaign with a sample group of millennial consumers who get asked to describe the Fireturd X using emojis...  ;D

--- End quote ---

 :rimshot:

westen44:
I think if you go ahead and include the profit from the carved AAA maple cereal, it does add up to 3 billion. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page