The Last Bass Outpost

Gear Discussion Forums => Gibson Basses => Topic started by: Ken on February 17, 2024, 09:46:23 AM

Title: TB+ construction question
Post by: Ken on February 17, 2024, 09:46:23 AM
Is the chunky rectangular part at the bottom of the TB+ a magnet? If so, what part does that play compared to the coils?  I ask partly because the vintage pickups don't have that.
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: gearHed289 on February 17, 2024, 10:34:24 AM
I'm kind of curious about this too. The TB+ in my '94 Les Paul, also a pair I bought off eBay, AND the chrome guitar-sized ones on my Fenderbird look exactly like these on the bottom.

(https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/y6oAAOSwiXtlpAv-/s-l1600.jpg)
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: exiledarchangel on February 17, 2024, 01:04:14 PM
Yes, it is the (ceramic) magnet, or better, magnets, since there are 3 (one big between the two blades and two narrower outside).
The vintage Tbirds have alnico magnets instead of steel blades, so no need for a magnet on the bottom, thats one of the reasons they don't need as much cavity depth as the modern ones.
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Ken on February 17, 2024, 01:08:21 PM
Thank you!  I think I see the three you're talking about side by side in the one without the sticker?  What's the copper (?) tape ( ?) across them for?
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: exiledarchangel on February 17, 2024, 01:16:12 PM
Exactly, the copper is used to ground the steel blades.
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Ken on February 17, 2024, 02:43:34 PM
Thanks a lot.  This puts a lot in perspective.  As far as the difference in depth between the ceramic and alnico, is alnico just smaller?  Why does the ceramic have to be so chunky?
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: exiledarchangel on February 17, 2024, 03:33:24 PM
It is because alnico is both the blade and the magnet, on the other hand steel needs an external magnet.
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Ken on February 17, 2024, 03:44:51 PM
Is it not possible for the ceramic magnet to be a blade?
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Alanko on February 17, 2024, 04:34:21 PM
Having, err, smashed one of these pickups out of frustration (an epoxy potted humbucker that is microphonic and prone to interference, how did Gibson f*** this up so badly?) the black rectangle on the back is a pad of epoxy over the copper tape that the coils and magnets are housed within.
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: exiledarchangel on February 18, 2024, 06:29:35 AM
Is it not possible for the ceramic magnet to be a blade?

It is possible I think, the problem is that this pickup would sound very trebly. Iron in a pickup core gives it warm sound (alnico contains more iron and other ferromagnetic metals than ceramic magnets). Think of it like a recipe, too much salt and you are ruing it, everything must be balanced
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Ken on February 18, 2024, 10:39:25 AM
Got it!  Thanks so much.  I'd love to have been in the room when they decided to go this route with the Thunderbird pickups.  I guess the goal was a more "modern" sound than alnico gives.  I like the TB+ a lot, but the construction seems way less elegant than the alnico ones.

Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Dave W on February 18, 2024, 06:13:45 PM
Is it not possible for the ceramic magnet to be a blade?

Ceramic magnets are  brittle. A ceramic thin enough to be used as a blade would almost surely break with the tensioned wire wound around it.
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: exiledarchangel on February 19, 2024, 12:39:11 AM
True. Also a ceramic blade so thin maybe is prone to demagnetizing.
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Ken on February 19, 2024, 10:56:21 AM
This is all great info, guys.  Thanks.
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: exiledarchangel on February 19, 2024, 01:02:25 PM
I mean, if there was a way to do it, since it is cheap (ceramic is cheaper than alnico), our friends from the exotic east would have found it and produce it in millions...
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Ken on February 28, 2024, 09:57:52 AM
I started a new thread, but probably should've posted this here.  A friend sent me his old 1991 TB+ and the bottoms are flat.  Where's the magnet in these?

Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: exiledarchangel on February 28, 2024, 01:34:34 PM
I bet its ceramic like the newer designs, this must be one of the first TB+ designs. Can you remove the metal cover?
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Ken on February 28, 2024, 01:37:55 PM
I'll see if I can remove them when I get home.  Curious what's in there.
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Ken on February 29, 2024, 12:36:47 PM
The bottom doesn't come off and I don't want to force it and break it.  And I can't see anything through the other hole that's not either of the mounting holes.
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: exiledarchangel on March 01, 2024, 02:56:50 AM
Is this back cover magnetic? Or its something like brass?
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: doombass on March 01, 2024, 05:04:17 AM
That back cover is probably mounted there straight after the potting was poured into the cover. That's why it has stuck to the back.
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Ken on March 01, 2024, 07:04:59 AM
Is this back cover magnetic? Or its something like brass?

It's not magnetic.  Not sure what metal it is.
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Dave W on March 01, 2024, 11:29:49 PM
It's special tone metal.  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: Ken on March 01, 2024, 11:34:01 PM
Heavy metal?
Title: Re: TB+ construction question
Post by: uwe on March 02, 2024, 08:49:00 AM
(https://media.gettyimages.com/id/86473852/es/foto/nibbs-carter-of-saxon-performs-on-stage-at-wulfrun-hall-on-may-5-2009-in-wolverhampton-england.jpg?s=612x612&w=gi&k=20&c=tvTgHRakzb6UGzQG-PRKciOy4maRgkkPK0VPU9IJPJg=)