Author Topic: Mudbucker ...not  (Read 14339 times)

SGD Lutherie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • David Schwab
    • View Profile
    • SGD Music Products
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #15 on: December 18, 2011, 05:34:42 PM »
Thanks for the exploded view, David. Explains a lot about the construction, at least.

I don't understand what you mean about the original sidewinders. The original EB/EB-1 brown cover pickup was a sidewinder and was a single coil. Of course it sounded nothing like what we usually think of when someone says single coil sound. But I don't think it wasn't hum cancelling.

I mean the later chrome cover pickup. That was a humbucker, and still a side winder:


SGD Lutherie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • David Schwab
    • View Profile
    • SGD Music Products
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #16 on: December 18, 2011, 05:40:54 PM »
My first thought when Dave said the aluminum element would create a muddied sound was - why not replace it with steel? Kinda like one big blade.....

You can't put steel between the two blades because it will short out the magnetic circuit.  If you take a humbucker and place a piece of steel between the two sets of poles, you wont get any sound.

The original mudbucker had a single row of poles between the two sideways mounted coils. What Gibson could have done is what I did, and utilized the fake pole pieces. What they ended up making is more like a DiMarzio Model One, but with a row of phony poles.

Curtis Novak did a replacement like this:



This is better than the Gibson SG pickup because it doesn't have the aluminum block and the real poles are closer to the top of the cover.

Don't get me wrong though, I'm a fan of the real mudbuckers, for what they do.  I have one in one of my '73 Ricks. :)

Pilgrim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9986
    • View Profile
    • YouTube channel
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #17 on: December 18, 2011, 08:10:23 PM »
Thanks for clueing me in on that.  I figured there was something I didn't know!
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any other invention with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila."

Basvarken

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
  • hobby luthier. gibson bass nerd
    • View Profile
    • www.enkoo.nl
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #18 on: December 19, 2011, 01:24:09 AM »




Why are the real polepieces not aligned with the fake screws in the middle?

If the string spacing is matched to those fake screws you'd miss out a big part on the E and G string.

SGD Lutherie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • David Schwab
    • View Profile
    • SGD Music Products
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #19 on: December 19, 2011, 07:08:29 AM »
Why are the real polepieces not aligned with the fake screws in the middle?

If the string spacing is matched to those fake screws you'd miss out a big part on the E and G string.

That's a good question! 

If you look at the photo here:

http://curtisnovak.com/pickups/EB-AA.shtml

The strings are falling over the fake poles.    ???

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21506
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #20 on: December 19, 2011, 07:14:35 AM »
Why are the real polepieces not aligned with the fake screws in the middle?

If the string spacing is matched to those fake screws you'd miss out a big part on the E and G string.

It works, Rob. I have it on my Epi Newport where a preowner slipped just one SD telecaster pup in slanted fashion underneath the chrome cover, no alignment with the cover screw holes, but all strings sound for whatever reason even.
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

Chris P.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5247
  • Warwickhoer
    • View Profile
    • The La La Lies
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #21 on: December 19, 2011, 07:45:28 AM »
My ri Rivoli had a Jazz pickup underneath the chrome cover, polepieces weren't aligned and it souned like a Rivoli:)

And the sidewinders of my '76 T-Bird do sound singlecoil-ish.

Psycho Bass Guy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2312
    • View Profile
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #22 on: December 19, 2011, 08:02:16 AM »
Dammit! The description of the SG Bass pickup makes it sound like it would be perfect for me.  Sidewinders are typically way too hot to usefully mix them with other pickups, but I love that tone. I sometimes just wish it could be mixed in with some more defintion from another pickup, but not all the time. I don't like Model One's because they're too nasal and not defined where I want them to be. Anyone know where I might get a cheap SG bass pickup?  ;D

eb2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1328
    • View Profile
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #23 on: December 19, 2011, 08:17:11 AM »
You can buy that one on ebay for less than the Novak.   ;D

I would imagine under a Gibson lid, the fake poles and real tele-bassish slugs all touch the lid.  That would spread the magnetic pull all across the string area to some degree, no?  A blade would maybe be more effective, but that - and the current Gibson thing - would work for picking up the strings.  

So, maybe the Artec Asian things out there these days are more accurate copies, but these give you a more versatile option that doesn't chop up your Gibson, or give the visual game away like the DiMarzio Model One.  I like that.  My problem with the Novak is that both the concept - make it sound unlike a Gibson - and the sound clips don't really do that much for me, or sound that unlike a DiMarzio which won't set you back that much money.  And two points off for claiming on the website the original mudbucker isn't humbucking.  If they were referring to a 53-58 mudbucker, cool, but that isn't what they were replacing.

My ears heard the sack-less Epi mudbucker as sounding Gibson-y.  I don't dislike the DiMarzio Model one.  The Model G is a Model One with the coils tighter together, and no epoxy blob.  It can fit in and sounds a bit different.  Shadow made a bass humbucker 20 years ago that was built like a regular guitar humbucker, but bigger physically.  That sounded nice too.  I haven't seen one in a few years.
Model One and Schallers?  Ish.

SGD Lutherie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • David Schwab
    • View Profile
    • SGD Music Products
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #24 on: December 19, 2011, 08:20:15 AM »
Dammit! The description of the SG Bass pickup makes it sound like it would be perfect for me.  Sidewinders are typically way too hot to usefully mix them with other pickups, but I love that tone. I sometimes just wish it could be mixed in with some more defintion from another pickup, but not all the time. I don't like Model One's because they're too nasal and not defined where I want them to be. Anyone know where I might get a cheap SG bass pickup?  ;D

You can rewind the mudbuckers to be cleaner. I rewound mine down to about 12k. It mixed real well with the Hi-A pickup I had at the bridge on my Rick. It kept a lot of the same charater too, but had more highs and wasn't overpowering.  

That's basically what I did with this rebuild. I made sidewinder that reads 8k and it will mix well with the new bridge pickup.

SGD Lutherie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • David Schwab
    • View Profile
    • SGD Music Products
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #25 on: December 19, 2011, 08:30:02 AM »
My ears heard the sack-less Epi mudbucker as sounding Gibson-y.  I don't dislike the DiMarzio Model one.  The Model G is a Model One with the coils tighter together, and no epoxy blob.  It can fit in and sounds a bit different.  Shadow made a bass humbucker 20 years ago that was built like a regular guitar humbucker, but bigger physically.  That sounded nice too.  I haven't seen one in a few years.

The Model G is an X2N with 8 poles instead of blades. The Model One reads 11 K, whole the Model G is about 15k.

Dave W

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 22256
  • Got time to breathe, got time for music
    • View Profile
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #26 on: December 19, 2011, 08:47:43 AM »
"actually a humbucker unlike the original Mudbucker."

I understand what he's saying, it's just that the original 53 pickup shouldn't really be referred to as a "mudbucker" since it's not a bucker.

SGD Lutherie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • David Schwab
    • View Profile
    • SGD Music Products
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #27 on: December 19, 2011, 08:52:20 AM »
"actually a humbucker unlike the original Mudbucker."

I understand what he's saying, it's just that the original 53 pickup shouldn't really be referred to as a "mudbucker" since it's not a bucker.

I figured he was referring to the pickup he was replacing, which is indeed a humbucker. I assumed he didn't realize it was.

eb2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1328
    • View Profile
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #28 on: December 19, 2011, 09:48:59 AM »
Quote
I assumed he didn't realize it was.

I did as well.

I had the joy of wrecking a Model G, and a Model One.  The G uses the same coils as a One, and the same pole pieces, and it looked like the same magnets.  If they made an Epoxy-Be-Gone product, you could make a G, or I guess you could make an X2n into a G.  But structurally they were the same thing.  I can't say what the output was on my G.  The model one I still have intact was reading 18k as I recall.  I'll take that.  I am in the minority, I know, but I loved the positives of the DiMarzios and never got hung up on the things that people find to be negative.  I also appreciate alternatives too, so one of these days I hope to get my hands on the new SG thing.
Model One and Schallers?  Ish.

SGD Lutherie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • David Schwab
    • View Profile
    • SGD Music Products
Re: Mudbucker ...not
« Reply #29 on: December 19, 2011, 10:07:39 AM »
I did as well.

I had the joy of wrecking a Model G, and a Model One.  The G uses the same coils as a One, and the same pole pieces, and it looked like the same magnets.  If they made an Epoxy-Be-Gone product, you could make a G, or I guess you could make an X2n into a G.  But structurally they were the same thing.  I can't say what the output was on my G.  The model one I still have intact was reading 18k as I recall.  I'll take that.  I am in the minority, I know, but I loved the positives of the DiMarzios and never got hung up on the things that people find to be negative.  I also appreciate alternatives too, so one of these days I hope to get my hands on the new SG thing.

Back when I bought some Gs they didn't have any epoxy in them, or is that just the Model One? I also had some Schaller Bassbuckers, which were Model G clones.  I found the G to be too muddy, so I made two blades for it and stuck it in a guitar I had!  I had it in the neck position on an 8-string bass. I did the same thing to a Bassbucker in my Kramer Duke, but I also unwound a bunch of wire on that to clean it up.