Robbo is a notorious alcoholic alright. But as far as I can tell there's nothing wrong with his memory.
I did two tours with him, I like to think I know him better than you do.
If his version of the story is far from the truth, wouldn't Gorham and Downey have stepped up to the plate by now?
Phil Lynott was an excellent bass player by the time they were a four piece. The (undoctored) radio recordings that I have from Thin Lizzy are there to prove that.
No matter what Ian Paice or Ritchie Blackmore may have said about him
Sshhhhh, they said that about him in 1972 and Ian Paice was quick to add that he became a very good bass player in later years. You know how Deep Purple members don't drink, pick fights, say bad things about other people and are generally kind to animals, Rob! And for Blackmore, even Roger Glover wasn't good/hungry enough as an instrumentalist. He wanted someone like John Glascock who however preferred to stay with Tull rather than join Rainbow.
It's hard to construe what Herr Visconti might have had to gain from depicting the recording of Live and Dangerous as he has done. He is no foe of Thin Lizzy or Phil Lynott and obviously proud of what he did with them. I also believe that most people trusted Tony Visconti to be able to record a bass or guitar in the studio with good results so there was no reason for him to invent something like that in connection with this album.
Downey has nothing to opine - his live drums are on there, anywhichway opinion you follow! And as for Gorham, he surprised me recently with the comment that Bad Reputation and Black Rose are his two favorite Thin Lizzy albums (neither of them with much or even any input of Robbo) and that he enjoyed playing with ever disciplined Gary Moore the most. I'm not sure he jumps to taking sides with Herr Robertson anymore and his diplomatic comment about Live & Dangerous has been that it is 75% live. (Interestingly enough, he has not mentioned bass overdubs IIRC, that I learned from Robbo's statement.)
So between Robbo's "almost nothing", Scott's "25%", Downey's roaring silence ("
My drums are on there, is all I'm sayin'."), Visconti's "75%" and Phil being unavailable to comment for the time being (I believe his only comment would be: "Did it go platinum or not?"), how about agreeing on something around 50%?
Ok, 60% live so you feel better, my favorite Lizzy diehard!
Or as Timothy B. Schmidt once graciously put it whether the backing vocals on the Eagles live album were live or not: "I don't think I can answer that question. Let's put it this way: The Eagles take the greatest care imaginable that backing vocals live are always as perfect as on record." Glenn Frey would later quip: "They were sung live at two different coasts!" Apparently, relations among the feathered ones were at that point such that Henley and Frey could not bear to sing in one studio with another.
PS: For all conspiracy theorists: Wikipedia claims that the recent Live and Dangerous remaster (contrary to its caption) is in fact the nineties one and that a new remaster was made but wiped "for unknown reasons" before the remaster release in 2010! If I was nasty, I'd say they did that because you could hear the cut and paste seams now more prominently!