Obviously minority models.
Uwe has made relaxed comments about these before. Not entirely my cup of tea, but not horrible. Like the Victory picked up traditional Fender shapes and did something to them which you either hated or preferred (I was vocally in the 2nd group!), this is Gibson's take on a semi-modern-looking bass. I don't find anything particularly wrong with it, but it will not set the world on fire. They probably had the instruction not to design something too outlandish or off-putting for the average bassist (and that is not us here in our tastes). Not as good as the Victory look, but better than the anodyne Gibson IV/V shape of the 80ies or the outright weird EB-Mosrites from a couple of years ago (though sound- and hardware-wise these were probably essentially the same as the new types and remember that their sound and hardware was good).
With a two-octave neck, a deep cutaway and a long upper horn to apparently combat neck heaviness, that is the just the type of shape/look that will find applause in bass magazines. People happy with their Fender P will hardly be sought out as new converts nor those who think that a TB Non-Rev was the last well-designed bass.
Won't get you thrown out immediately auditioning for a jazz rock or lounge combo. Try that with a Flying V or an Explorer bass.
Yeah, I'll buy one. With less reluctance than I have done with some other models, but not with bated breath.