The Last Bass Outpost

Main Forums => The Outpost Cafe => Topic started by: Chris P. on November 27, 2016, 04:46:43 AM

Title: Worst WWII planes
Post by: Chris P. on November 27, 2016, 04:46:43 AM
https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/05/15/top-ten-worst-aircraft-of-wwii-2/

Not posted yet, I think?
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: Rob on November 27, 2016, 12:33:53 PM
Great post.
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: TBird1958 on November 28, 2016, 11:31:58 AM


 Interesting group of aircraft, there are several I wasn't familiar with - Regardless of which side you flew, for I think it was an extraordinary act of courage.
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: uwe on November 28, 2016, 11:38:20 AM
Some usual suspects there. But some planes did badly in one theater, yet great in another, the Aircobra comes to mind, great (by accident) at freezing temperatures in Russia (generally better flight performance doesn't help you if your plane can't even get off the ground at minus 20 degrees centigrade), rubbish everywhere else. Or the P-38 which did well in the Pacific with its high speed, high altitude, long range and good armament, but was ineffective in Europe guarding the bombers against the Luftwaffe.

I suspect that the Fins' emotional attachment to the Brewster Buffalo was based on its flying ability at even lowest temperatures as well - along with its further ability to make do with even the lousiest landing strips. Sometimes, simple practical aspects beat performance.
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: TBird1958 on November 28, 2016, 12:18:45 PM

 The Englanders had a rare talent for making really ugly airplanes, several of them are on this list.
 
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: uwe on November 28, 2016, 01:20:15 PM
For anything you send into "Battle", Fair(e)y  :gay: as a manufacturer name is unfortunate too.  :-X
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: slinkp on November 28, 2016, 01:29:42 PM
Nice list, I'd never heard of most of those.... been a long time since I kept up with such things :)

Here's another fun list:
http://militaryhistorynow.com/2014/05/02/gooney-birds-13-experimental-aircraft-designs-that-were-too-weird-for-wartime/

... buried in which is this:
http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=1078

Never thought I would see the phrase "coal-powered ramjet"   :o :o
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: uwe on November 28, 2016, 01:31:02 PM
The Englanders had a rare talent for making really ugly airplanes, several of them are on this list.

They improved over time, I thought the Hawker Typhoon/Tempest was a good design. So was the Gloster Meteor. Then again: What can you expect of a nation whose members cannot even distinguish a Hellcat from a Corsair?

Luftwaffe pilots only had issues telling the P-40 and the Hurricane apart, but those two at least shared the common predicament of being lumbering beasts ...

And we got to give them credit for the Concorde! That is still the coolest-looking passenger plane ever.

(http://static1.businessinsider.de/image/56a00f17dd08959b0f8b45d2/die-concorde-stieg-vor-40-jahren-fr-ihren-jungfernflug-in-die-lfte-eine-hommage-an-einen-superflieger.jpg)
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: Alanko on November 28, 2016, 03:00:05 PM
They improved over time, I thought the Hawker Typhoon/Tempest was a good design.

The Typhoons were better once they re-designed them to prevent the tail from falling off! You could fill all ten slots on that list with British designs from the era. The Avro Manchester was dangerously crap by most accounts, and we seem to have had a particular skill with coming up with sluggish sitting-duck flying boats like the Saunders-Roe Lerwick.
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: uwe on November 29, 2016, 12:38:57 AM
But there was the Short Sunderland to make up for it!!! When I saw that recently in Duxford for the first time in reality (it was one of my all-time favorite Airfix kits), it warmed my heart, endearingly ugly and with a considerable contribution in keeping the U-Boat wolfpacks at bay. And it was nicknamed "Flying Porcupine" by the Luftwaffe because it always still had another gun lurking at some place where you wouldn't expect it.

The Catalina was no doubt the better looking flying boat - it had a real classy Art Deco'ish design, beautiful and timeless to this day, like a Thunderbird (bass), but the Sunderland gave new meaning to the term "flying boat" and had something of a sea monster.
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: TBird1958 on November 29, 2016, 10:46:50 AM
They improved over time, I thought the Hawker Typhoon/Tempest was a good design. So was the Gloster Meteor. Then again: What can you expect of a nation whose members cannot even distinguish a Hellcat from a Corsair?

Luftwaffe pilots only had issues telling the P-40 and the Hurricane apart, but those two at least shared the common predicament of being lumbering beasts ...

And we got to give them credit for the Concorde! That is still the coolest-looking passenger plane ever.

(http://static1.businessinsider.de/image/56a00f17dd08959b0f8b45d2/die-concorde-stieg-vor-40-jahren-fr-ihren-jungfernflug-in-die-lfte-eine-hommage-an-einen-superflieger.jpg)




 That's the second coolest plane, SR-71 Rules all!

It even has black hardware like most Gibson basses.  :rolleyes:




Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: uwe on November 29, 2016, 11:51:56 AM
The SR-71 is of course orgi-as-tic (they also have one in Duxford), but last I heard it wasn't a passenger plane (much like a Corsair bears only passing resemblance to a Hellcat, at least when viewed in foggy Scottish skies)!  ;)

"That is still the coolest-looking passenger plane ever."

But standing there in the American hangar in Duxford, I thought that X-Men hottie Jean Grey

(http://www.kino.de/wp-content/uploads//2015/06/382765_1.jpg)

was gonna pass by any minute and board it. It is to aircraft what the Batmobile is to cars.

And, yes, together with the Gibson Bass Book, Famke Janssen is a real peak in Dutch exports though her mind reading skills could give, uhum, rise to potentially embarrassing situations. Then again, you never have to be too obsessed about shaving with her ...

(https://media.giphy.com/media/MjGfcwXOcx4be/giphy.gif)

Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: TBird1958 on November 29, 2016, 02:11:34 PM
But there was the Short Sunderland to make up for it!!! When I saw that recently in Duxford for the first time in reality (it was one of my all-time favorite Airfix kits), it warmed my heart, endearingly ugly and with a considerable contribution in keeping the U-Boat wolfpacks at bay. And it was nicknamed "Flying Porcupine" by the Luftwaffe because it always still had another gun lurking at some place where you wouldn't expect it.

The Catalina was no doubt the better looking flying boat - it had a real classy Art Deco'ish design, beautiful and timeless to this day, like a Thunderbird (bass), but the Sunderland gave new meaning to the term "flying boat" and had something of a sea monster.


  Perhaps all the ugly ones had to be made in order to give rise to the Concorde - tho wasn't it a joint project with Frankreich?

Have to say Typoons and Tempests were my fave U.K. single engine aircraft, brutish, ugly for sure, you didn't want to be on the shooty end of either them.
 
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: wellREDman on November 30, 2016, 03:34:14 AM
As a kid a concorde turned up at tehran airport where my dad was working so i got to have a look around, what most surprised me was that all the elegant design  stopped at the cockpit door, inside the cockpit it was so different from any other airliner, brutish, functional and I guess, looking back, like the cockpit of a military aircraft.

 I'm a tempest/typhoon fan too, I think it's the  Muscle car aesthetic, like the F4U, the Fw190 and the Sea Fury too. Ive always found it odd that there hasn't been any on the airshow circuit, the closest Ive seen was a really late model spitfire with the tempest chin intake thing going on.
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: uwe on November 30, 2016, 05:01:28 AM
"Tehran", "as a kid", "airport" - did your dad by any chance work for the, uhum "State Department"?  :mrgreen: Wasn't that a vanity landing for the Shah at the time? I believe it only flew to Tehran once. How long did you live there? (I was there a few years ago and charmed by the bustling city and the surrounding mountains as well as the reckless traffic!)

I can attest to your Concorde experience - you were spot on in your description. I never flew in on, but I walked through the cockpit and passenger area of a grounded one, the tube shape reminded of military aircraft where paratroopers sit on benches at the side, grimly facing each other (though the Concorde would be too fast to drop off paratroopers). It looked archaic, prototypish in fact. I'm 1.90 meters in height and the only place where I would not bump my head was in the middle of the aisle (which was incredibly narrow even for airplane standards).

I read somewhere that they want to get one flying for regular service again? The old dream of supersonic air travel hasn't quite died yet, it just ran a little out of fuel!

Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: Alanko on November 30, 2016, 06:09:34 AM
I'm still annoyed that I never got to see Concorde fly, having missed several opportunities to do so. I've been inside one, and yes it is cramped! Indeed the cockpit looks like that of a bomber. At the time I suppose that aesthetic looked cutting edge and suitably business-like.

There is a Sunderland flying boat at the RAF museum at Hendon, and you can walk through if it you desire.
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: uwe on November 30, 2016, 09:36:09 AM
Ah, last time I was there (in Hendon), they didn't have that yet, makes another visit worthwhile!

I was always fascinated by that pic on the Airfix box

(http://t15.deviantart.net/XTm7yE26HyqCA2HijT3fAjc5Tn4=/fit-in/800x400/filters:fixed_height(100,100):origin()/pre12/c448/th/pre/i/2016/237/6/8/airfix_short_sunderland_mk_iii_boxart_by_rlkitterman-daf8u56.jpg)

though I severely doubt that the Condor and the Sunderland ever had an air battle against each other  - more likely, if those two flying behemoths had ever met over the North Sea, they would have waved their wingtips at each other and never mentioned the encounter at home, after all air combat was other people's job and reconnaissance planes were valuable. And while the Condor (a beautiful plane in its own time but totally unfit for any and all military purposes, it had sensible range that's all) might have looked like it would have taken the lead in combat, it probably stood no chance against its ungainly English counterpart.
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: Highlander on November 30, 2016, 02:11:44 PM
Hellraiser or Corsicat... I'll never live that one down... They have a "Cherry Blossom" at Cosford RAF museum...
I've worked on 7 Concordes and been on all the British ones... Everyone forgets she was a child of the 50's so the technology was archaic... if any of you get into the cockpit of the last one that flew, try and spot the hat jammed just inside the door on the starboard side, and I'll tell you the story of why they are there, if you don't already know...
Me at work, back in the early 80's... :mrgreen:
(http://i655.photobucket.com/albums/uu280/kjrstewart/US/1981KminConcordespilotseate.jpg)

Funny someone should mention this spindley legged thingie...
(http://i655.photobucket.com/albums/uu280/kjrstewart/AVIATION/2007various1086.jpg)
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: TBird1958 on November 30, 2016, 04:23:30 PM
Ah, last time I was there (in Hendon), they didn't have that yet, makes another visit worthwhile!

I was always fascinated by that pic on the Airfix box

(http://t15.deviantart.net/XTm7yE26HyqCA2HijT3fAjc5Tn4=/fit-in/800x400/filters:fixed_height(100,100):origin()/pre12/c448/th/pre/i/2016/237/6/8/airfix_short_sunderland_mk_iii_boxart_by_rlkitterman-daf8u56.jpg)

though I severely doubt that the Condor and the Sunderland ever had an air battle against each other  - more likely, if those two flying behemoths had ever met over the North Sea, they would have waved their wingtips at each other and never mentioned the encounter at home, after all air combat was other people's job and reconnaissance planes were valuable. And while the Condor (a beautiful plane in its own time but totally unfit for any and all military purposes, it had sensible range that's all) might have looked like it would have taken the lead in combat, it probably stood no chance against its ungainly English counterpart.

 It's only got single .303s in the turrets that would take a lot of shooting  ;)
But yeah, it's go that "English ugliness" thing down! 



Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: wellREDman on December 01, 2016, 03:47:38 AM
"Tehran", "as a kid", "airport" - did your dad by any chance work for the, uhum "State Department"?  :mrgreen: Wasn't that a vanity landing for the Shah at the time? I believe it only flew to Tehran once. How long did you live there? (I was there a few years ago and charmed by the bustling city and the surrounding mountains as well as the reckless traffic!)

 nothing so exciting, dad was an engineer for British Airways, although in retrospect I do often wonder about the actual professions  a lot of my parents yankie friends  . the posting was 76 to 81 but dad was there solo after the revolution. we were on the last BA flight out as things started to turn bad, was quite exciting for me as a 9 year old as there were only 2 seats left for me, mum and brother so I got to ride all the way home in the cockpit Jumpseat. my dad was on the last RAF herc out but the company had conned him back there within a fortnight.

   living there from ages 6 to 9 I really feel like that was where I grew up, I feel homesick when i see pictures of Iran. I long for an excuse to be able to go back and visit.

 growing up on what was in effect a large American airbase gave me a closer cultural affinity to septics than my compatriots. I was exposed to NFL before soccer for example. and also was the foundations of my other guilty pleasure, a lifelong fascination with combat helicopters and a 30 year collection of toy ones.
Title: Re: Worst WWII planes
Post by: Alanko on December 01, 2016, 05:56:41 AM
...if any of you get into the cockpit of the last one that flew, try and spot the hat jammed just inside the door on the starboard side, and I'll tell you the story of why they are there, if you don't already know...

I thought they all had the cap wedged in? Something to do with the bulkheads expanding in flight at mach speeds, and contracting again trapping the cap forever? An enterprising thief stole the flight engineer's cap from the Concorde that is now in the Seattle museum of flight. I gather that the Russian's equivalent, the TU-144, had an unpleasantly noisy cooling system to deal with the same heat generated by mach speeds.

The biggest crime however is the Concorde mouldering at Heathrow. There were plans to put it on static display, but at the moment it is hidden out of sight and out of mind. Like our static Vulcans, these large airframes don't hold up massively well in British weather without maintenance.