Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - copacetic

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25
331
Other Bass Brands / Re: Bruce Johnson's Scroll Bass
« on: August 16, 2009, 07:09:52 PM »
Here are a few pictures of my Bruce Johnson Bass including a diagram of the features:

332
Gibson Basses / Re: Late EB-3s ...
« on: July 30, 2009, 12:09:55 AM »
I'm with Uwe all the way just about on this except that the 60's EB-O &3's did have the correct body contours and slim styling. The 70's more 'manly' thickness was lost a little in the translation but I understand what they were trying to do. If you want the real mud with something extra you need a EB-2(not the 2-D as they were trying to get some sort of tone which was not really pure(!) or  the Rivoli. The '60's EB-O's &  3'etc left you stranded but fun to play. All arguments were over when in 2006 the Supreme came out and finally a Gibson that summed it all up with no arguments. So basicly the gamut is the EB-2-Supreme. All things are covered just about except one thing: Gibson got it right the very first time in what was it.. 1953: the Gibson Electric bass, almost the same as Leo Fender got it right the first time.

333
Fender Basses / Re: My '78 A neck is very thin.
« on: July 26, 2009, 06:08:32 PM »
I've owned 2 Precisions with very thin necks (actually exactly the 1.5 as in Jazz) that were not designated with the 'A' at the base of the headstock and were the necks originally shipped with those basses. They both were all maple necks (early 70's). I always seek out thin necks as is my prference and happened to come by them years ago. When I checked up on them with Fender they did say they did make some necks up in the early 70's without the blocks mostly in the all maple but some with the rosewood and pearl that were put on Precisions randomly and did not have the A stamp so they are out there and most likely this continued until more tumutuous events with Fender in the late 70's and early 80's.

334
Other Bass Brands / Re: Muse Inc
« on: July 19, 2009, 10:04:45 AM »
I'll have to say that is pretty cool looking. Nice combination of fetures and design. Wonder how it sounds and the actual body dimensions.
Yairi in Japan has had several really cool looking basses that had an upright if not slightly too trbly egdy sound but the body dimensions were slightly comical(huge).

335
Other Bass Brands / Re: Bruce Johnson's Scroll Bass
« on: June 28, 2009, 11:33:37 PM »
Yeah, good 'ol Bruce has not updated his website since 2003, as much as i have hampered him about it. I assure you he is busy though. He puts his nose to the grinder every day. I came across him a little over 10 years ago as I had a collection of Ampeg Scroll basses and when I heard he was making basses along those lines we foud each other. I have # 055 of his creations. The other 2 Ampeg Scroll tops I have have both been scutinized by him as he is interested in each and every one ever produced and has most of what exists logged in his files. Even back then it was a no less than a year if not 2 year wait. When I mentioned to him a year or so back if he would ever think of fretting my #55 he balked a bit and said please leave it fretless. Thing is I am getting on in years and have taken a liking to short scale basses for the most part or at least with jazz neck profiles. I'l try and post some pictures of mine. It has some unique features.Might even think about putting it up if the notion strikes me as i am not doing it justice letting it just sit in it's case.

336
Fender Basses / Re: MIM Revelation
« on: June 27, 2009, 08:33:55 AM »
The 'official' Fender color designation during those years was MIdnight Blue. They had a series of colors with the Midnight designation.
My friend has a MIM 1998 Jazz and in his particular bass the tuners &  pickups were USA made. He bought it new and from what he recalls they were using USA pups and tuners around then. He opened his up and sure enough it was true. It could very well be that they were using both because of parts stock overages and shortages.

337
Fender Basses / Re: MIM Revelation
« on: June 23, 2009, 11:05:48 PM »
I agree withe Bass VI's comments on the American Standard and Delux but figure Fender has to try something there to be modern. The Custom Shop pricing is way beyond and somehow getting a bass that has been 'artificially' road worn is somehow strange to me, however it is probably best just to close your eyes and play and see from there how it feels and plays. I get the impression that Bass VI works in a music store and has some first hand experience on a daily basis with respect to taking the instruments out of their factory boxes. I just felt the MIM's were a simply honest bass and somehow reminded me of many years ago going into a music store and picking up a bass that just seemed stright forward and 'honest' and is what it is. I was putting these basses through a Little Mark Bass amp with a 4x10 cabinet(same as my home rig). The Mark Bass set ups are real contenders as well but I did go across the board as mentioned at the top of this thread. There was a custom Shop '64 that was great and reminded me of one of my own but still $2,400. was over the top in my opinion. Another thing I forgot to mention that most of the MIM's I tried had resonance which is what really surprised me. Maybe it is the wood/woods thay use, but I always factor how a bass resonates when unplugged. I kow when it comes to other materials that might not weigh in as much but I do have some an'80's PRS bass and 4 Celinders that have graphite necks and possibly a few other 'modern' materials running through them but they also really resonate unplugged and deliver all the way plugged in.   

338
Fender Basses / MIM Revelation
« on: June 22, 2009, 11:02:01 PM »
Recently I had been asked to gather up some basses for some music programs so I went  around to various music stores in the SF Bay Area. Approaching this task I decided to approach the quest with a very open 'mind' with respect to brand. When playing through the Fender selections I just went down the line and found something that surprised me quite frankly. The MIM Fenders came out on top 80% of the time when coming to feel, playbility, balance, weight and dead spots. Even the sound in most cases was totally acceptable. I simply picked the basses up, plugged them in without checking out the various hardware, pickups, headstock decals etc so to keep with my open approach. I had a budget that was not too restrictive to work with but I wanted to just see what would come out in the wash. The result was surprising to me because of course I had preconceived notions that the Japan, USA, custom shop etc would be the overall better instruments. This was not necessarily so at all. It has been years since I really went in a music store and checked out a bunch of basses. I have quite a collection of basses that I have played and kept over the last 45 years and with respect to the Fenders in my collection consisting of a '56, '71 & '73 Precision and a '66 & '71 Jazz, '67 & 78 Mustang and these are all great playing & sounding basses. So I felt I had to mention my surprise and relief that Fender is still capable of making some great instruments and these at  prices that will not break the bank. The only upgrade I might suggest would be the pickups if absolutly necessary.
I also recently attended a club date to see Sly & Robbie. When their 1 1/2 hour stunning set(as usual) was over I got talking to Robbie and  upon broaching the subject of the jazz bass he had been playing he handed it over to me and it was MIM Standard Jazz bass! He mentioned it it was his current favorite bass and not just for touring. He had been using it in the studio as well. For anyone who knows this guy you know what he is capable of on the instrument.

339
Fender Basses / Re: I just bought a Musicmaster !
« on: June 18, 2009, 06:12:09 PM »
By the way is there a significant weight difference on the Musicmasters over the years they were in production like the rest of the Fender Basses? (i.e. the '75-'80's Fender Precisions, Jazz and Mustangs were almost 2 lbs heavier on the Precision and Jazz and even the Mustangs). I ask this becasue the Musicmasters were even more pointed at the youth/students and it seems it could not be expected that a kid could hold up 10 lbs. I have a '67 Mustang and it weighs 7 1/4 lbs and my daughter has a '78 Mustang and hers weighs 9 3/4 lbs. Hers' actually sounds better but it pains me to play it standing up for more than 15 minutes and it stops the blood circulation in my leg sitting down! She loves hers however.

340
Fender Basses / Musicmaster, Mustang Pickups
« on: June 18, 2009, 06:03:06 PM »
On the subject of Musicmasters brought up in another thread several weeks ago it revived my interest and I am wondering something:  Has anyone had ever tried putting a Musicmaster (or a Mustang) pickup in a P-bass?  I do have a '67 Mustang bass and I ultimatly chose it over 3 of my P basses (a '66,'71 & '73) some years ago and sold them in fact. As mentioned in that "I just bought a Musicmaster" thread  the response over the neck is totally even (which is also the case with the Mustang) and somehow the Mustang pickup just really had it all (for what I wanted in a Fender solidbody). Now there is the issue of longer scale: do ya think a Mustang pickup or Musicmaster would handle the larger string spread inserting it in the same p-bass pickup location?

341
The Bass Zone / Re: Bass Technology at its peak
« on: May 15, 2009, 05:03:12 PM »
Jess is still around.However I believe for all 'practical' purposes he's not doing anymore restorations from what he told me about 2 years ago after he worked on my B-15. I think he would be a great subject for a book with graphic details of all he created and the business side.(not sure how many copies would sell which is the caveat)But as a historical document/tribute to him it would be there for posterity.
One of the nicest people you'll ever meet. Humble and into bass.

342
Other Bass Brands / Re: Sir Paul playing a Yamaha BB series bass.
« on: May 14, 2009, 11:06:42 PM »
Well Kenny with that last comment I think you have nipped it in the bud and Abbey Road might be at a dead end. I mean we did go over Fender, Rickenbacker (and they even have their own forums), Yamaha & Hofner. Now before someone brings up Klira, Danelectro or Epiphone Casino's......

343
Other Bass Brands / Re: Sir Paul playing a Yamaha BB series bass.
« on: May 13, 2009, 05:27:42 PM »
I can't open that pic either.Re Presley's Precision I thought it was weird in a way also but I recall reading about it in a discussion he had about Bill Black's upright with Bass Player magazine just around the time of Chaos & Creation. I think he's have to leave that one in it's righty set up don't ya think? Actually i thought something like that should be in a museum or something just to let people know even Presley had a thing about  bass.

344
Other Bass Brands / Re: Sir Paul playing a Yamaha BB series bass.
« on: May 12, 2009, 09:59:42 PM »
I'll stick my head out a bit and venture the Ric is his original , went through a psychedelic paint job and then stripped down to the natural. It might be his one and lonely Ric. Returning to the exciting (hijacked)Fender thoughts, there was a mention several years back that Elvis's own Precision was under consideration to be possessed by whatiz name himself. Wonder what happened?

345
Other Bass Brands / Re: Ovation Magnum help
« on: May 12, 2009, 09:48:16 PM »
I've put it on my list to find it and i am sure in the same file I have the schematic..The Mag I has the i piece guard and the II had the 2 piece for that battery insert. Glad you 've had contact with John. He was around when that bass was developed and the fact that he's still there is amazing. I'l let you know when i find it and I can either fax or send it to you.

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25