Author Topic: 1982 G-3  (Read 2905 times)

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21514
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
1982 G-3
« on: August 03, 2010, 04:06:43 AM »
Given the late year, that CAR fin is probably the real thing.

http://cgi.ebay.com/1982-American-Gibson-Grabber-3-G-3-BASS-GUITAR-w-case-/360286709378?cmd=ViewItem&pt=Guitar&hash=item53e2c2e682

Only second one I see with maple board though - CAR fin G-3s tend to have ebony boards. This is still different from other previous maple board G-3s in that it has a more durable three piece maple neck without the usally grafted headstock (the ebony board ones came with the classic one piece maple neck plus grafted headstock).



However, bad to appalling photographs do the item no favors whatsoever.




 :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: August 03, 2010, 05:35:28 AM by uwe »
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

jumbodbassman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1339
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2010, 08:52:03 AM »
never saw a g-3 in maple.  maybe a modified grabber???
Sitting in traffic somewhere between CT and NYC
JIM

Highlander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12542
  • There Ken be only one...
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2010, 08:55:21 AM »
Does this count as a difference in model and not a "fin" issue, my Lord of the Dark Side...? ;)


Uwe: It doth, wood is wood and color is color.

Understood, my Lord... ;)
« Last Edit: August 03, 2010, 09:51:39 AM by Kenny's 51st State »
The random mind of a Silver Surfer...
If research was easy, it wouldn't need doing...
Staring at that event horizon is a dirty job, but someone has to do it; something's going to come back out of it one day...

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21514
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2010, 09:30:29 AM »
never saw a g-3 in maple.  maybe a modified grabber???




Unclear and impenetrable like the thoughts of the Dark Side the question is. What is meant, body or neck? Rippers, Grabbers and G-3s all at one time a phase had in which built of alder their bodies were, not of maple, young Padavan! More prevalent maple body G-3 are than those of alder their bodies are made of. Reconsider and rephrase his question he must. A wrong question never to a righteous path lead it can.  
« Last Edit: August 03, 2010, 09:39:47 AM by uwe »
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

Denis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Harvester of Appendixes
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2010, 09:35:10 AM »
Hahaha, Uwe, that's awesome!
Why did Salvador Dali cross the road?
Clocks.

exiledarchangel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1662
  • I like big necks and I cannot lie
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2010, 09:39:01 AM »
Wood color doesn't matter as much as hardware color, me thinks.
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it.

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21514
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2010, 09:49:48 AM »
They do look different, don't they?

We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

exiledarchangel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1662
  • I like big necks and I cannot lie
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #7 on: August 03, 2010, 09:53:59 AM »
Yes, the one on the left has a little guitar built-in.
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it.

Highlander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12542
  • There Ken be only one...
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #8 on: August 03, 2010, 09:59:13 AM »

Just the titles, my Lord, just the titles... ;D
The random mind of a Silver Surfer...
If research was easy, it wouldn't need doing...
Staring at that event horizon is a dirty job, but someone has to do it; something's going to come back out of it one day...

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21514
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #9 on: August 03, 2010, 10:09:54 AM »
Over knee boots never looked better on any man. Fräulein Rommel excepted of course.




We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

Highlander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12542
  • There Ken be only one...
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #10 on: August 03, 2010, 10:17:55 AM »
Oh, so glad I saw his last tour with them, right up fron at the Hammy O... 8) 8) 8)
The random mind of a Silver Surfer...
If research was easy, it wouldn't need doing...
Staring at that event horizon is a dirty job, but someone has to do it; something's going to come back out of it one day...

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21514
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #11 on: August 03, 2010, 10:39:34 AM »
Yes, limeys under proper Germanic instruction can do a thing or two.



We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

Highlander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12542
  • There Ken be only one...
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #12 on: August 03, 2010, 10:54:57 AM »
Has anyone ever effectively answered the question of why they did not keep going after Dunkirk, otherwise I would most certainly be speaking German... mind you, that means my mum and dad would probably still be up on the Island... dad didn't get called up until after the end of June that year... (classic shot btw)


one of the best alternates I've read... one of my literary heroes...
The random mind of a Silver Surfer...
If research was easy, it wouldn't need doing...
Staring at that event horizon is a dirty job, but someone has to do it; something's going to come back out of it one day...

dadagoboi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4214
  • huh?...HUH?
    • View Profile
    • CATALDO BASSES
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #13 on: August 03, 2010, 11:15:11 AM »

one of the best alternates I've read... one of my literary heroes...
Mine too!  "Do Androids DReam of Electric Sheep?"  tops "Blade Runner" in my estimation and it's my fave Sci Fi movie.

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21514
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
Re: 1982 G-3
« Reply #14 on: August 03, 2010, 11:27:16 AM »
Hitler never had a serious intention of conquering Great Britain - he wrote already in Mein Kampf that a downfall of the Empire would not benefit Germany which had no interest in overseas colonies (the Lebensraum was east ...), but only the comparative "upstarts" Japan and the USA which would then simply assume control in the void left by the Empire. He also regarded the British "race" as largely "Aryan" (also in Mein Kampf), albeit unfortunately infested with the dark powers of "world jewry".

Dunkirk was an extended hand to the UK to enter into armistice talks with full honor intact. Hitler did not want an England too weak for fear of a crumbling Empire. When that failed, there were no serious plans in the cupboard to invade and occupy England - neither the German Army nor the Kriegsmarine nor the Luftwaffe were geared for a large scale invasion from the sea, they were forces created solely for and to support land wars. Rather Hitler believed that the U-Boat embargo and the London Blitz would bow GB into submission and once again into the entering into peace talks, effectively ceding Continental Europe to the Third Reich and leaving the Empire unscathed.  It didn't work that way, but Churchill saw the danger that it could and he farsightedly kept England long enough in the war unconquered for Japan to attack the US and the US then enter WW II.

The Third Reich, for all its inherent evilness, did not even bother to occupy France in full, much less would it have occupied the Brit Isles which are - let's face it - strategically irrelevant for control of the Continent. Well, at least we had the Channel Islands which you guys, adding insult to injury, did not even reconquer after D-Day but simply circumvented until Germany capitulated.
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...