Author Topic: Doing some recording, God I thought i sucked SOO bad, until i heard this!!  (Read 4862 times)

Deathshead

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
    • View Profile
I think the first Van Hagar album after DLR's departure pretty much reinvented and revitalized the band. The old Van Halen had become stale, good songwriting - never Van Halen's forte, how many of their songs can you strum on acoustic guitar around a camp fire? - was few and far between. You could hear the enthisiasm in that first album with Hagar and it was all coming full circle as VH was influenced by Montrose and I hear a little of Hagar even in DLR's early voice.

It would be pretty funny however to get everyone loaded for a VH1 acoustic sing along around the campfire, HAHAH!!

Basvarken

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6889
  • hobby luthier. gibson bass nerd
    • View Profile
    • www.enkoo.nl
You mean like this?  8)


lowend1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
    • View Profile
Here's my .02 on this age-old subject.
1) DLR after VH is better than VH after DLR.
2) Neither Hagar's solo stuff, nor Van Hagar, nor Chickenfoot can hold a candle to that first Montrose album.
3) Michael Anthony's voice had as much to do with creating the "Van Halen Sound" as anything Eddie ever played. Never cared for his basswork though.
If you can't be an athlete, be an athletic supporter

Freuds_Cat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
    • View Profile
I cant fault any of that logic.
Digresion our specialty!

slinkp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1368
    • View Profile
    • slinkp home page
Maybe it's colored by nostalgia (I was 14 at the time and susceptible to a lot of crap that came over the radio), but I've always thought 1984 was a really great album.  Sure, the lyrics are about nothing worth thinking about, but it's fun music and well played. Great drumming, great rhythm guitar work, and DLR was the perfect cartoonish vocalist for the band.   I thought they were never as good at being "serious" as they were at being a ridiculous rock and roll cartoon.  But I can't fault them for getting tired of it.
Basses: Gibson lpb-1, Gibson dc jr tribute, Greco thunderbird, Danelectro dc, Ibanez blazer.  Amps: genz benz shuttle 6.0, EA CXL110, EA CXL112, Spark 40.  Guitars: Danelectro 59XT, rebuilt cheap LP copy

Deathshead

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
    • View Profile
Here's my .02 on this age-old subject.
1) DLR after VH is better than VH after DLR.
2) Neither Hagar's solo stuff, nor Van Hagar, nor Chickenfoot can hold a candle to that first Montrose album.
3) Michael Anthony's voice had as much to do with creating the "Van Halen Sound" as anything Eddie ever played. Never cared for his basswork though.







Yea M.a.'s voice made the vh sound.

Basvarken

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6889
  • hobby luthier. gibson bass nerd
    • View Profile
    • www.enkoo.nl
No way.
Eddie van Halen's guitar playing did.

Michael Anthony's backing vocals were very good, but to say they made VH sound is ridiculous

lowend1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
    • View Profile
No way.
Eddie van Halen's guitar playing did.

Michael Anthony's backing vocals were very good, but to say they made VH sound is ridiculous

Eddies guitar innovations got them noticed originally (and he naturally got most of the glory), but the one constant through the lineup and songwriting changes was MA's vocals. Eddie's approach and sound changed numerous times over the years, not to mention the plethora of EVH wannabees that sprouted up like crabgrass in other bands. The backing vocals are what ties the different eras together - you can't miss 'em as being uniquely VH.
If you can't be an athlete, be an athletic supporter

Basvarken

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6889
  • hobby luthier. gibson bass nerd
    • View Profile
    • www.enkoo.nl
Oh whatever.
Weird: I'm not even a VH fan, and suddenly I find myself defending VH :o

Cheers guys. :toast:

uwe

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21514
  • Enabler ...
    • View Profile
The public doesn't buy albums for guitar solos or Tony McAlpine, Vinnie Moore, Chris Impelliteri and Yngwie Malmsteen would all be rich. And an excellent live show (of which DLR was a large part) sells tickets, not records as Black Oak Arkansas (to name a DLR inspiration), Kiss and The Rolling Stones can all testify.

The commercial aspect of VH were MA's backing or more precisesly chorus lead vocals (btw: also the reason why the Van Halens got him into Mammoth in the first place) while DLR was talking and screeching his way through the verses. Songs like Dance the Night away weren't radio staples because of Eddie's solo (hum it to me from memory and I'll change my mind!), but because of the hi-gloss chorus vocals.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2010, 11:26:27 AM by uwe »
We've taken too much for granted ... and all the time it had grown ...
From techno seeds we first planted ... evolved a mind of its own ...

nofi

  • Guest
one man's back up vocals does not a band make. imho. like it or not it's all about the guitar. i wonder if we would be having this discussion if the back up stuff came from alex instead of mike.

bassvirtuoso

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
  • My God, it's full of chrome!
    • View Profile
I'll agree that MA did a great deal to keep VH alive in the mainstream. My personal favorites are VanHaggar albums though, I always felt Sammy did a better job vocally matching with MA than DLR ever did. Plus some of their songs are better written, IMHO of course.
-Dave

German-American Chrome Fan Club Member #666

lowend1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
    • View Profile
If you can't be an athlete, be an athletic supporter