Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - lowend1

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 173
61
Gibson Basses / Re: New Epiphone Newport Bass.
« on: April 03, 2023, 08:16:19 AM »
The Newport has now gone from $379 to $449 in most stores.  So for the people who got it at the lower price, good.  For the other people (like me) not good.

Seems to be par for the course with Epiphone. The same thing happened with the Vintage Pro and, IIRC, the Embassy. I've seen it with guitars, also.

62
Gibson Basses / Re: Herr Trujillo with an 81 Gibson Flying V Bass ...
« on: March 31, 2023, 07:33:46 AM »
He used an MXR Phase 90. He said something along the lines of "It's the only effect I'll allow myself." I read it in a magazine over 40 years ago, so please don't ask what my source for this is.  ;D And I find it funny that some people argue it was a flanger when it is so obviously a phaser on Moonlight.

I just ran across - on Reverb - a previously unpublished interview Phil did with Tony Bacon in 1981 where he discusses his gear. In the midst of raving about his new Dynacord amp, he mentions, "And sometimes I used a flanger. I've gone off using it now, but I used to use a flanger on the bass, just to give it that bit of top without it being clacky."

63
Gibson Basses / Re: Herr Trujillo with an 81 Gibson Flying V Bass ...
« on: March 30, 2023, 10:01:25 AM »
Yeah, that is another one!  :mrgreen:

And the new state of the art phasers don't really provide that hissy, wet  vintage sound either. I have a Boss state of the art phaser and it sounds nowhere as phaser'ish good as my old piece of shit Ibanez stomper (that mechanial click it had ...  ;D ) did. It's way too dry and clinical - I have meanwhile bequeathed it onto our guitarist who likes it for Stones'y stuff.

I bought an Azor mini Phaser off Amazon for like $25. It would be nice if the slowest speed was a little more so, but otherwise it's great. I also bought a Flamma FC-05, which is a multi-modulation pedal. Very nice, but the Azor sounds better with bass. Tried a TC Electronics Blood Moon as well, but it was way too noisy and I sent it back.

64
Gibson Basses / Re: Need your opinion
« on: March 30, 2023, 09:22:14 AM »
It's not that surprising:
The body is much thinner and much smaller than the later production model. Plus the routing underneath the pickguard is a true "swimming pool".



Swimming pool? That's pretty much the Great Lakes.

65
Gibson Basses / Re: Herr Trujillo with an 81 Gibson Flying V Bass ...
« on: March 30, 2023, 09:20:11 AM »
'Bad Reputation' (the album) was the first Lizzy album I owned, always liked that song with its strip tease/burlesque style bass line! You should have taken your clothes off while playing it though, Rob! Perhaps with some of those nipple tassels too?   :gay:

But it needs a pick sound, Lynott's style is all about pick playing. And more cowbell phaser please!!!

I recently bought myself a cheap phaser just to play this - and "Stranglehold"...

66
Gibson Basses / Re: Herr Trujillo with an 81 Gibson Flying V Bass ...
« on: March 25, 2023, 12:12:10 PM »
   I spy a Ibanez Destroyer and a Bicentennial Thunderbird combo. I had the same basses in '76 frankly the Ibanez got much more playing time than the Thunderbird.  The 76 bird had michrophnic pickups and the action couget low enough, the Ibanez on the other hand played and sounded great. The Destroyer underwent a number of mods through the years but it's been in it's present form since around 1986.Image Url =

This Image was Uploaded by - http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=imgur_upload.upload_image_to_imgur

The Destroyer was ridiculously cool, but I never bonded with it. I bought it pretty cheap, too. I was always looking for something as a backup to the Thunderbird but nothing I came across at the time did it justice. Whoever owned the Bicentennial originally had the bridge saddles re-grooved so that the strings sat further down in the slots. It played nicely but had very low output, which I compensated for by turning the amp up more. Always got compliments on the tone, though. It has been re-fretted twice - the second time because the first job was botched a bit. Also replaced the badge and saddles around the same time.

67
Gibson Basses / Re: Need your opinion
« on: March 25, 2023, 11:54:00 AM »
Nice work, Rob - seriously. You are a true Renaissance man.

68
The Outpost Cafe / Re: Guess who
« on: March 24, 2023, 05:31:59 PM »
I’ll just leave this here…
"Two skis came between my skis forcing my legs apart and then a body pressed against me."

69
Gibson Basses / Re: Herr Trujillo with an 81 Gibson Flying V Bass ...
« on: March 24, 2023, 07:58:30 AM »
Whaaaaat, you turned a Flying V into a Flying F?!  Or at the very least disseminated the heinous atrocity!!!

Tell me, is there still a death penalty in your State by any chance?

Ok, given your commendably adolescent taste for outlandish basses and throwing rock star shapes,




we can perhaps commute it to a life sentence.  8)


Did it even intonate correctly? Looks like you had the bridge almost falling off ... :mrgreen:

PS: What happened to the cutting edge lamé polo shirt, cutie?  :-*

When my cousin (also a bassist... a dyed-in-the-wool Fender man to this day - and DESPISES Gibson basses) heard that I bought it, he commented that his effort was not intended to be taken and played as a serious instrument - "Only YOU would do that."
Did it intonate? Who knows? The neck was held on with only two screws and no neck plate - not sure why. Every once it a while it would shift and I would have to smack it back into position and snug up the screws. Off I went, into the Dead Boys' "Sonic Reducer"...
Of the three basses in the pic, only the Thunderbird remains here with me. The Destroyer was traded even up at Rudy's in NYC for a '72 EB-3, which is also here today - but only after a long and circuitous journey involving JB weld, truss rod nuts and dubious storage environments. Story for another thread. Suffice it to say that the EB was initially sold off to finance the purchase of... a Gibson Flying V Bass.
The shirt eventually deteriorated, peeling like a cheap rubber t-shirt transfer.

70
Gibson Basses / Re: Herr Trujillo with an 81 Gibson Flying V Bass ...
« on: March 23, 2023, 09:15:22 PM »
This one:




This precedes the Rocket Roll ones by a few years, it existed as early as 1973, Jim Lea would sometimes use it for TV miming, but I'm not sure whether he ever used his live or to record. It sounds nothing like Jim Lea's regular bass sound at the time, especially noticeable in the second vid which is a re-recording of the studio track for TV (Brit Musicians' Union rules required this back then) with an especially boisterous upfront bass mix.





The Rocket Roll basses looked different (and likely sounded better with their P/J pup combo), I believe they are also rarer because they were only produced for a short time:



That earlier 1973 model was in essence an EB-3L with wings and none of the kalamazoomph, a docile-sounding cult object, nothing more. I bought mine because I drooled for one as a teenager, but honestly the Ric 4001 Ibanez bolt-on Ho I played at the time sounded better. Gorgeous to look at though.

I had one of those as well. My cousin was killing time one day in the music store where his wife worked, so he bolted a maple 70s P-Bass neck to an orphaned Ibanez body and they put it out on the sales floor. Of course, I showed up a few days later and bought it on the spot. I played it as it was for awhile and then modded it with a Model One (filling the bridge pickup hole with Bondo) and sprayed it bright red. I actually managed to get credit for it as an art project in college. Wound up selling it to a female bassist who needed something with more image than her natural finish Precision.
There was a local bassist who used one of the Rocket Roll basses with his band - I have a pic of him with it somewhere...
Here's my Ibby V, post surgery along with its roommates at the time.

71
Gibson Basses / Re: Herr Trujillo with an 81 Gibson Flying V Bass ...
« on: March 23, 2023, 05:59:47 PM »
...my flight school of six Flying V basses (two Gibson shorties, two Dean long + extra-long scale, one Ibanez long scale & one Kramer Flying Broom XKB-10 medium scale), it even has an extra-long scale neck (35"). Make no mistake: size matters.

Which Ibanez do you have? Is it one of the 70s "Rocket Roll" basses?

72
Gibson Basses / Re: Thunderbird II 2023
« on: March 23, 2023, 05:48:08 PM »
David Kiswiney shared these pics with me.

Rob, does this mean you'll be gearing up for another edition of the book?
I know that my OCD would take issue with this one floating around without being compiled and dutifully registered.

73
Bass Amps & Effects / Re: New tube combo from Fender
« on: March 23, 2023, 09:34:11 AM »
Sunn's iconic amps were toast long before Fender bought the company. That happened way back when the Sundholms sold to Hartzell and he started making solid state amps.

The solid state Concert and Coliseum Bass were not bad amps on their own - they had a pretty visible presence on stages throughout the 70s.

74
Gibson Basses / Re: Herr Trujillo with an 81 Gibson Flying V Bass ...
« on: March 23, 2023, 09:30:02 AM »
Well, it looks cool with that shape and fin and all. But a short scale bass with those limp Ripper pups wouldn't be my first choice if I otherwise play an active long scale Warwick.

I bought a black one new in 1981. It sounded like ass in the store, but I was smitten with the look. I was convinced it would sound better when I ran it through my Ampegs. It didn't. I traded it a year later, even up for a new Kramer Pioneer Bass.

75
Gibson Basses / Re: Thunderbird II 2023
« on: March 23, 2023, 09:24:34 AM »
Great looking bass, and well thought out. The relocated strap pin is a good idea. Hamer started doing that in the 70s on their Standards (Explorers).

The Thunderbird Studio has its lower strap button located off center as well, although not as much so as this bass.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 173