The Last Bass Outpost

Gear Discussion Forums => Bill's Shop: Projects, Mods & Repairs => Topic started by: Alanko on July 12, 2018, 07:32:03 AM

Title: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on July 12, 2018, 07:32:03 AM
I enjoy guitar archaeology. I like seeing a guitar and trying to work out what has happened with it, and what needs to be done to it.

As per my NBD thread I picked up a used but not abused Dearmond Starfire at the weekend. If I bought it from Reverb it would probably be called a 'Barn Find' instrument. The guy who sold it to me bought it new, used it in a funk band, and then hid it in the attic for years as he moved back to 34'' instruments. As such it is clean, but its time in storage has introduced some issues.


The bass has one scratch in the top which I plan to infill with superglue, level and polish out. The clear coat on this is poly, which is pretty thick. This means I should be able to level, blend and polish everything in. I'm guessing a screwdriver or other tool slipped over the surface of the instrument near the selector switch. Oops!

Beyond that it needs a new wiring harness, a fret dressing, and a general clean and polish. Some of the chrome work on the bridge pickup is pitted, so I can only polish what is there to be polished! The metal work is dull and smeary, but luckily none of it is scratched. The odd thing is that the black saddle adjuster screws and springs have an odd white bloom on them. It is a bit like a superglue bloom, or the result of some old plastic off-gassing. I can't find the source of this, but it has ruined the black finish on the screws.

The electronics are the weak link in the chain. I've seen this before on Korean instruments; you get amazing build quality then totally average electronics. The 3-way swith is one of those closed in box-type switches. Once they go dead they stay dead. The pots are 500k Cor-tek branded units. Nothing special, and a bit to on/off for me to bother saving them. As per some Epiphones and the like, they used a kilometer of wiring where a meter would do. There is a lot of slack in the wires in this bass.

The frets are green, and have a bit of roundwound chew as well. The bass came with astonishingly dead, low tension rounds with red silks. Maybe Rotosounds?

Before pics:

(https://i.imgur.com/6OXsPdj.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/5zSfmVE.jpg)
Green frets and ham.

(https://i.imgur.com/kiElvw0.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/NPnruxr.jpg)
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Pilgrim on July 12, 2018, 08:59:50 AM
Yeah, I see what that scratch probably came from.  You have a cool time machine there!
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Dave W on July 12, 2018, 04:53:16 PM
Doesn't seem like anything that can't be made presentable.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on July 13, 2018, 01:38:36 AM
I was able to work on this a bit last night.

The superglue drop fill worked. Here I had already scraped the fill level with a protected safety razor blade:

(https://i.imgur.com/A8Fy76R.jpg)

Once leveled, polished, buffed out and waxed, the repair was invisible:

(https://i.imgur.com/61YMFIK.jpg)

The only odd spot is the lighter spot that has appeared in what was the middle of the scratch. It appears that I buffed through the darker lacquer slightly? Or maybe it is just a blip in the wood itself? Or the scratch was deeper there than I thought? It has buffed out just like the rest of the finish.

My other big problem with the top was a hazy spot from playing wear:

(https://i.imgur.com/jRP0q1S.jpg)

I wet sanded this out with 2500 grit, then worked through polishes. For polishing I'm using Poorboys SSR2, then SSR1, then EX-P. I also have 'Autoglym', and even Brasso! All of this stuff has the capacity to polish to a certain point, and the trick is to make sure you aren't just swirling up the finish further, and working out when to go to the next polish.

Luckily for me, the finish has bounced right back!

(https://i.imgur.com/r87vwot.jpg)

You can see the little 'sunspot' above the switch hole quite clearly in this photo. The blue tape means that the frets are next.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Dave W on July 13, 2018, 08:14:15 AM
Nice work! I wouldn't let that "sunspot" bother me, from the photo it looks like it's in the wood.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Pilgrim on July 13, 2018, 08:39:38 AM

Excellent work, and that bass is looking fantastic.  Nice work on the scratch, and I agree with Dave; IMO the net result is light years ahead of the previous situation.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Rob on July 13, 2018, 04:12:08 PM
Nice work!
The light spot is only noticeable because it was identified.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on July 16, 2018, 01:27:21 AM
A wee update:

The frets sprung back to life. They needed a wee bit of a level, and oddly the 1st fret was a tad lower, consistently across its width, than the rest. A few low spots and bit of a roundwound chew, but nothing terrible:

(https://i.imgur.com/fisJAYF.jpg)

The bridge plate has cleaned up, as has the saddles. The black adjuster screws have an odd white salt-like deposit in the threads. I've tried a few techniques to remove this, but nothing has worked yet. I might just resort to Sharpie marker. The white stuff is visible on the end of the E and A adjusters here:

(https://i.imgur.com/qQTstSY.jpg)

I've cleaned up the pickups, screws etc:

(https://imgur.com/14T3cr4)

I'm building an entirely new wiring harness for the bass, using a modified aftermarket ES-355 scheme. I'm decoupling the two volume pots by wiring the pickups to the wipers, and using the resistance of the pots themselves to isolate each volume control. The stock wiring harness might end up in another project:

(https://i.imgur.com/u1a1Daf.jpg)

The pots are Cor-tek brand, so I guess 90's Dearmond instruments were really Corts in disguise? The pickups themselves were made in the US by Dearmond; even the insulation on the wire features the brand name of an LA-based wire manufacturer.

While I wait for more wire to show up, I'm doing a bit of work on my Aria bass. I've posted this on here before, but it has since become my fretless 'kitchen sink' modding platform:

(https://i.imgur.com/oeEIAqi.jpg)

It needs a lot of work done to it.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on July 17, 2018, 12:58:14 PM
Bumping my own post, like a saddo.  ;)

I stuck some parts bin roundwounds on the bass, to sort out alignment of the bridge pickup. When the bass arrived the pickup was aligned over to the bass side. I plugged the holes and started over, using the strings to work out where the poles should be.

The fingerprints are starting to appear...

(https://i.imgur.com/CZJ7SOK.jpg)

I left the fretboard overnight to take on an oil finish. I mix up naptha (or acetone if there isn't binding or nitro about), and boiled linseed oil. The naptha/acetone thins the oil so that it cures quickly, which means that it doesn't get too gummy and dries with a nice satin sheen without having to put on tens of coats. This is a finish rather than simply 'hydrating' the board, but I don't buy the notion of using oil to hydrate anyway. :o 

I like the dark, subtly satin look on a board:

(https://i.imgur.com/GpRGhiS.jpg)


A bit of a conundrum happened last night. I fitted the pickups and two of the poles were loose on the bridge pickup. I tightened them up, and they loosened again. I superglue'd them in, which sorted them out! One pole piece was simply unscrewing itself, whereas the other was screwed into a thicker fluted metal insert, and that was itself loose. These inserts fit into holes drilled in the flatwork.

I went on 'Bass Gear Direct' and picked up another Guild BS-1 pickup.  :mrgreen: It won't be here for a few weeks, so I will run this on the Dearmond pickups and see how I get on. It will be good to know I have a plan B.

Plus, I've been listening to a lot of Jefferson Airplane gigs today, and now I want one of these.  ;D ;D ;D

(http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e242/12stringrainbow/Cassidy_Guitar-LG-WEB_zpsmpq4clji.jpg)

Madness. I worry about one blemish in the finish, and this thing was carved up! I like the crude quick-release catches holding the electronics in place and the unfilled pickup switch hole. The bridge also seems to be intersecting the bridge pickup surround. Bisonics look good on a sunburst Starfire! The only catch I can see is that the bridge pickup is reversed, and I have no idea how you do that unless you route out the pickup bezel further.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Dave W on July 17, 2018, 10:09:57 PM
Fretboard finish looks nice.

I don't understand the appeal of the Bisonics. To each his own, but keep in mind that both Jack Casady and Phil Lesh quickly moved on from them and haven't looked back. People want to recreate a sound they left behind about a half-century ago.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on July 19, 2018, 07:29:04 AM
I don't understand the appeal of the Bisonics. To each his own, but keep in mind that both Jack Casady and Phil Lesh quickly moved on from them and haven't looked back. People want to recreate a sound they left behind about a half-century ago.

Probably not much to it, Dave. Jack and Phil were both using modified basses through fairly unorthodox rigs. If they were using bone-stock Starfire II basses then there might be a bit more of a case there, but they weren't. Probably there are bits of:

Nostalgia: these pickups were hard to find for the longest time. We know Phil, Jack, Berry Oakley, Chris Hillman and co all used them, but you couldn't go into Guitar Centre and buy the same basses. Dark Stars (and Novak's reproductions) are expensive and therefore only available to a fairly exclusive breed of bassist, which feeds the idea that they are top-shelf pickups. Curtis Novak perpetuates the notion of 'doing it right' with his work, and the notion of Bisonics being complex and difficult to reproduce sort of helps this idea along.

They look cool: Daguet Guitars make a perfectly accurate Bisonic replica, that deletes the fiddly pole adjuster system and complex plastic flatwork/skeleton. They probably sound spot on, but people don't seem to be excited about them because they look more like generic bass single coil pickups:

(http://www.daguetguitars.fr/wp-content/uploads/dagstar19.jpg)

Guild got rid of them: Guild phased them out and started using hot humbuckers in their basses instead. Musicians tend to buy into the idea that "the older X was the better X". People think that older 'silver screw' Boss pedals sound better than their modern counterparts, and this is within the realm of cheap, mass production stomp boxes! Again the fact that Guild moved over to different tech feeds the exclusivity of the original pickups.

Maybe they sound alright?: I've only played one vintage Guild bass with an original Bisonic. It was a transition M85 bass with a Guild 'bucker in the bridge and a Hagstrom Bisonic in the neck. The bass had a push switch that either cut all the treble or all the bass from the neck pickup, so I couldn't give it a fair hearing.

Seemingly the Guild reproductions aren't correct, but then again the Dark Stars weren't correct either. I've played a Newark Street Starfire II reissue, and it was perfectly nice. It had the same neck as my Dearmond, and the fit and finish was similar. The pickups seem to be a bit 'honest vanilla' in my playing. Everything and nothing! Maybe this is the appeal of the Bisonics? They have quite an uncoloured, broad tone that pickups up dynamics?

My Guild BS-1 bridge pickup won't fit the Dearmond. The trim ring collides with the bridge! I would need to build my own pickup rings that aren't as long as the Bisonic rings, but as wide, because they need to cover the Dearmond pickup route. The Bisonic ring slopes, and has a pronounced roundover. A total piece of work to reproduce.

Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on July 19, 2018, 08:37:54 AM
I will say this. My Guild pickup is fragile. The black flatwork simply epoxies into the chrome surround. This came undone, so I had to re-epoxy mine. I also re-wired it with coax hookup cable:

(https://i.imgur.com/OM5WfY2.jpg)
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Pilgrim on July 19, 2018, 08:53:11 AM
Alanko makes a good point that musicians often assume that older=better.  We know a lot more about electronics than we did in the 60's, and I suspect that many of the pickups and switches we make today are better quality than older ones.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: slinkp on July 19, 2018, 01:03:56 PM
I agree there's a lot of hype, fetish and nostalgia in the bisonic appeal.

I do think there's something nice about their sound, though it may be too vanilla or sterile for many, but to me it's appealing and evidently works well for some people. I have never owned a bass with them installed, but I like the clips I hear.  If I had funds for more basses I'd probably pursue owning something with one of these type pickups.

I also quite like the Lakland demos of basses with their "chisonic" pickups, in fact they were some of my favorite demos in the extensive Lakland clips collection. They sound pretty similar to bisonics as far as I can tell. But I guess these pickups also are too small and practical for people to care about them? :)
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on July 19, 2018, 02:07:53 PM
I also like the Lakland demos of basses with their "chisonic" pickups. They sound pretty similar to bisonics as far as I can tell. But I guess these too are too small and practical for people to care about them? :)

There was a Jazz bass body kicking around on Basschat with Chisonics installed. I was tempted, but it was a bit dented and chipped. I would have had to track down a neck, then hope that everything worked together.

My Starfire is all back together! I've already scratched the finish re-installing the switch. I used a handy Ebay tool for tightening the switch, and I guess it caught the finish. I'm not too upset, because at least they are my marks.  :mrgreen:

That visible ground wire is also annoying, so I will sort it out at some point.

(https://i.imgur.com/yPHD1MI.jpg)
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Rob on July 19, 2018, 03:42:32 PM
Really nice job on that!
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Dave W on July 19, 2018, 07:51:52 PM
Looks great, I wouldn't worry about the visible wire but I know you will.  :)

No doubt some people would love the sound of the Bisonic if it were totally separated from the hype. Nothing wrong with that! I'm just jaded after seeing all the hype and the bandwagon effect over the years, and it was never so intense as with Fred Hammon's Darkstars. At the dear departed Dudepit, it seemed like every piece-of-junk hull of a bass on eBay would get posted as "Darkstar project?" as if the pickup could magically turn the hull into a thing of joy and beauty. Ugh!
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: slinkp on July 19, 2018, 10:14:51 PM
I sold one of those junk hunks to somebody! A very trashed hot-rod-flame-paintjob EB-0.  I bought it on Ebay as a fixer-upper and discovered it was far beyond my ability to fix - the headstock "repair" on it was an abomination. I forget who bought it from me (at a loss to me of at least $200 I think), but he was a 'pitter, and he built and grafted on a new headstock, painted it white, and (I'm pretty sure) put a Dark Star into it.  The photo I saw looked pretty great, I have to say, considering how it started out.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Pilgrim on July 20, 2018, 08:01:17 AM
I sold one of those junk hunks to somebody! A very trashed hot-rod-flame-paintjob EB-0.  I bought it on Ebay as a fixer-upper and discovered it was far beyond my ability to fix - the headstock "repair" on it was an abomination. I forget who bought it from me (at a loss to me of at least $200 I think), but he was a 'pitter, and he built and grafted on a new headstock, painted it white, and (I'm pretty sure) put a Dark Star into it.  The photo I saw looked pretty great, I have to say, considering how it started out.

At some point, these re-works turn into George Washington's axe.  "Yup, that's George Washington's axe. We've replaced the handle four times and the blade twice, but it's his axe."
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: slinkp on July 20, 2018, 08:28:33 AM
Oh yeah, a frankenstein rebuild for sure. There might be some actual Gibson wood in there somewhere, but that's it.
I found a copy of the sale message - it was a guy named johnnythumbfive, or John DeLowry, who I don't think is here. Wish I had a picture of what he did; as I recall it turned out pretty cool.

Sorry for the tangent. Looking forward to seeing/hearing more of this pretty Starfire!
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Dave W on July 20, 2018, 02:03:17 PM
Oh yeah, a frankenstein rebuild for sure. There might be some actual Gibson wood in there somewhere, but that's it.
I found a copy of the sale message - it was a guy named johnnythumbfive, or John DeLowry, who I don't think is here. Wish I had a picture of what he did; as I recall it turned out pretty cool.

Sorry for the tangent. Looking forward to seeing/hearing more of this pretty Starfire!

I remember him. Here he is https://www.facebook.com/john.delowery playing a Warwick 5er.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on July 21, 2018, 11:22:03 AM
Sorry for the tangent. Looking forward to seeing/hearing more of this pretty Starfire!

No worries. It seems a shame that the Dude Pit is away as it sounds like it was a valuable resource.

I took the Starfire to rehearsals last night, but I don't think I got the most out of it. We were in the 'Green Room', which has an Ampeg PF350 into a matching cab on casters. I got on better once I found the control for the tweeter in the cab, but the whole amp setup sounded a bit hollow and a bit short on low frequencies. It was also overdriving fairly unmusically if I had the gain up past 1:00.  The Starfire sounded a bit 'meh' in this context. The pickups don't have any sort of defining characteristic. I will gig the bass at least once this week coming, so I will find out then.

This is a Dearmond with Darkstar pickups. The surrounds look like custom jobs. I will have to copy these, I think.

(https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53dfcee2e4b0c0da377c65c7/t/57c7afb6bebafbcfa76ae825/1472704447427/?format=750w)
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Pilgrim on July 23, 2018, 07:48:53 AM
If you still have those parts bin roundwounds on there, don't forget that strings make a big difference in sound, too. Might be some nice potential there.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on July 23, 2018, 01:24:45 PM
If you still have those parts bin roundwounds on there, don't forget that strings make a big difference in sound, too. Might be some nice potential there.

The roundies are safely away in the bin now. I currently have it strung with Status 'Hotwire' flatwounds. Apparently these are re-branded Picato flats, though this is just a rumour from Basschat.

I have the same strings on my PJ Mustangs. They're cheap,, well balanced and have a good tension.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on July 28, 2018, 10:15:31 AM
The Starfire had its first outing on Thursday!

(https://i.imgur.com/QKuf6Iu.jpg)

It worked out fantastically! This bass wants to feedback! I spent a bit of the soundcheck working out the hot spots on my side of the stage, and then using these during the gig.

Yesterday I was back on Mustang patrol.

(https://i.imgur.com/P3ShlDI.jpg)
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on August 11, 2018, 01:33:00 PM
A wee update.

(https://scontent-lht6-1.cdninstagram.com/vp/8a1260460b595071d61a0be014414eec/5C05EAEC/t51.2885-15/e35/37955516_1087150088116271_2466046182707691520_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Rob on August 11, 2018, 05:26:52 PM
Very nice
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Happy Face on August 11, 2018, 06:35:28 PM
Very nice

Indeed!
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Dave W on August 13, 2018, 12:23:27 AM
Almost looks new!
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on August 13, 2018, 01:25:39 AM
Thank you all, thank you Dave. The Bisonics are a pretty nice tonal upgrade. They have a wider, flatter bandwidth than the stock Dearmond pickups. In fact I gather this is the appeal of the originals? In some aspects they are like a modern soapbar pickup in that they have an even, uncoloured tone.

I had to break both pickups! The black section with the pole pieces and magnets is simply glued into the chrome flashy bit with black caulk. This isn't very strong! One pickup arrived with some of this already failing. I stripped the caulk out of both pickups and re-glued them with epoxy. I also re-wired them with coax cable. Guild give you less than a foot of cable with some annoying quick-connect terminal on the end. Not in my bass!

I've reversed the bridge pickup as a nod to Jack Casady, as both his hacked up sunburst, and original 'Yggdrasil' bass have this setup in their current state. However I've been watching archive footage, and neither bass had this setup while he was using them. Very odd! The sunburst is seen in the Altamont footage, complete with snapped E string pretty much on the first note, whereas the other bass is in the Woodstock, Family Dog and early Hot Tuna footage.

The biggest job by far was carving the pickup bezels. I started with 5mm ABS for the bridge pickup and 3mm ABS for the neck. Unlike a Les Paul pickup ring, which can lazily follow the archtop once you screw it down, these bezels have to stay flat on the top to match the underside of the pickup. They also have to perfectly match the contour of the top of the bass and ramp at the correct angle to align the pickup parallel with the strings. Luckily Dearmond put the same geometry on the back of the bass as the front, so I stuck some 60 grit paper to the back of the bass in the pickup locations and used this to grind the underside of my DIY bezels. I had to make the bezels wide enough to cover the Dearmond pickup routes. I also had to match the sloped edge of the Guild originals. I gather Guild made these from wood in the '60s?!

One other annoying thing is that the Dearmond has a lot less space between the strings and the top of the body. This must be dictated by both the neck-to-body angle and the depth of the neck in the neck pocket. I had to shave a lot of material off my bezels to get the pickups far enough away from the strings.
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: BTL on August 13, 2018, 04:54:02 PM
That looks fantastic!
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Dave W on August 13, 2018, 09:44:40 PM
I hope you charged yourself a steep hourly rate for all that work you did on the pickups and surrounds  ;)
Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Alanko on August 14, 2018, 02:13:55 AM
I leveled dressed and polished the frets on my mate's R8 Les Paul for two beers, so I guess I'm a cheap guitar tech?! I had to rebuild a shattered pickup ring on that guitar and replace the output jack. For two Birra Morettis.  8)


The payment, for me, is seeing the pickup bezels sitting correctly on the top of the bass. On the few Darkstar'd Dearmonds I saw kicking around, the corners of these bezels typically sit above the top of the bass. Mine grip the top like a limpet!  ;D

I had a job interview a couple of weeks back, and the stress about that manifested itself as me building a pile of prototype pickup bezels and testing every part of their production.

(https://scontent-lhr3-1.cdninstagram.com/vp/10740d2d2c726f4de0c9ad3560bbd908/5BF89465/t51.2885-15/e35/37656155_2062475300681419_308957196832473088_n.jpg)

Title: Re: Dirty old Starfire, Dirty old Starfire.
Post by: Dave W on August 14, 2018, 08:58:04 AM
Making the metalwork look that nice is no easy task.