No, I just think it's a poor design and it's clunky and ugly to boot.
Nothing at all wrong with the tune-o-matic principle, this is just the wrong way to implement it.
No matter how many years Gibson has used it, it's not too late for them to correct their mistake!
I dissent, not clunky, but "airy" yet stable and "sustainy", of timeless elegance. And you can also clean up underneath it, tell me one other bridge that satisfies our craving for cleanliness being next to Godliness. Just imagine the myriads of bacteria hidden away underneath other (base-mounted) bridges and eating away the wood undetectedly ...
I loved it first time I saw it. Archaic, idiosyncratic. As American as tail fins on a Buick. The bison of bridges. It looked like no other bridge, you had to use large manly tools with it, not flimsy allen wrenches that fall to the floor and you never see them again. A right size screwdriver for a three point falls to the floor and you might have a hole in the floor, but
you'll find that screwdriver. Moreover, it can be used for efficient self-defense if someone tries to take the three point (with bass attached) away from you.