Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Alanko

Pages: 1 ... 56 57 [58] 59 60 ... 110
856
Maybe. The pattern continues over the binding. It is like it impacted something with that texture, such as un-tinned copper wire. None of the finish is loose in the area.

I've overpainted the area with a few coats of black nail polish now. I will level this and then use a UV-cure clear coat (nail polish again!) with a UV lamp. Way more trustworthy finish from this system than using an air-cure nail polish, especially in a clammy apartment/flat in central Scotland.

857
Rickenbacker Basses / Re: Not a fan entirely ...
« on: August 24, 2017, 02:14:55 AM »
I find Dave's 'fun stuff' videos amusing at times, but they are sort of long winded. Occasionally he's trying a bit hard to show how much of a good guy he is by setting up either hopeless instruments or by helping out people by not charging them for the work. In all honesty his views seem a bit out of date. Specifically he rants about Rickenbackers because he tried a single example in the '70s and didn't get on with it. Rickenbackers require more skill and specialist knowledge to set up, beyond the fairly universal techniques for Fender-family instruments. Whether that is a negative point against Rickenbacker, or not, is a debate that will never be resolved. Roger Sadowsky won't touch them, or didn't back in the day.

858
Gibson Basses / Re: mid 60'd gibson double neck anyone?
« on: August 23, 2017, 01:51:22 PM »
I wonder what the origins of this instrument actually are. The bass side had a bigger neck pickup at some point. The sparkle finish and speed knobs are more of an '80s thing, but the quality of the machine heads and general clunkiness suggests '60s Japanese. Fundamentally it looks like total junk, but I'm still curious as to where, when and how it became the thing it is now.

859
Pics for all!

The bass, thirty seconds after I opened the case at my desk at work:



More Bent Tuner than Hot Tuna:




The bit that annoys me. This weird scuzzy damage does through to the wood. I've been going over this section with black nail polish, and will flatten it back and buff it out. Not sure how this will turn out.



Green frets, yow!



860
Semi-clever. Superglue fumes seeped out the f-hole overnight and clouded up the finish. When I removed the clouding with acetone the numbers came off the poker chip under the impedance switch... but...

The poker chip didn't match the pickguard and pickup and was bothering me anyway. I removed it, and the bass looks better as a result. Just a black chicken head knob sitting in a sea of black.

861
Gibson Basses / Re: 20th Anniversary JCS [new pics]
« on: August 22, 2017, 05:54:12 AM »
Heh, I killed the finish on a cheap guitar with bug spray!

862
He's realized finally that buying crap '80s Ferraris wasn't the investment he thought it would be.

863
A tuner upgrade is in the works. Those Gotohs look really good.  :mrgreen:

I straightened out the tuner last night. I simply disassembled the tuner, took the paddle-axle-worm gear mechanism, straightened it in my vice slowly, heated it up with my hot air gun, let it cool and reassembled the tuner. It looks ok, but I would rather be using new tuners in the long run.

The transformer was a bit tricky to screw down. I've mounted it to the center block beyond the pickup, towards the bridge. I couldn't get two screws into the bass, as the transformer would foul with the underside of the pickup in any location anywhere I could locate the transformer and get a screwdriver in place, so had to make do with one screw. The body material (mahogany?) is quite soft, so I had to impregnate it with superglue in a small spot first. I will keep an eye on this one, but the transformer is quite tightly wedged in.

864
Gibson Basses / Re: 20th Anniversary JCS [new pics]
« on: August 21, 2017, 08:28:48 AM »
How can you tell where a Jack Casady bass was made? My new one has a serial starting either 'R04I' or 'R041' followed by four numbers.

865
Well the seller was wrong! The 3-way still works perfectly. The transformer is loose inside the base however. That switch would be a good replacement, but I might not need it... yet.

One thing I've noticed is that one of the tuners has bent. The peg, aft of the end of the mounting arm/axle, has bent. I might try heating it and gently returning it to the correct shape. If that doesn't work then I'm on the hunt for a replacement.

The frets are tarnished and a wee bit worn, so they will be getting leveled.

There are a few chips in the paint, so I will drop-fill these. there is a sort of scuzzily scratched up area on the side of the body, through to the wood. Lots of narrow-width but deep scratches. Not sure yet how I will tackle them.

866
The four pole/three way rotary switch is simply to replace the defective switch in the bass at the moment. Four pole is overkill, but this configuration of rotary switch is far more commonly available than the two pole/three way switch the circuit requires.

Thanks for the answers! It looks like the Casady basses uses 2.5 k ohm pots, which aren't as commonly available as 250 k or 500 k pots.

867
Bill's Shop: Projects, Mods & Repairs / Couple of Jack Casady questions!
« on: August 20, 2017, 02:14:53 PM »
So I've finally bartered, haggled and brokered myself a black Jack Casady bass!

I got it for a good price, in part because it has a couple of issues:

1) The transformer is loose within the instrument and rattling around.

2) The 3-way switch spins in perpetuity as it is somehow missing the keeper. It still has the three positions, but you can cycle through them endlessly.

In short, where does the transformer sit within the bass? I thought it might be attached to the switch originally, but from having had a look at Casady harnesses for sale it appears to be separate from the switch.

Also, can I get away with a generic four pole/three way switch or is there a space consideration? How bit a component can be fished inside a Casady bass?

Also, is there any advantage to upgrading the potentiometers, and do they use different values given the low impedance of the pickup?

868
Rickenbacker Basses / Re: Music videos that feature Rics
« on: August 16, 2017, 01:55:31 PM »
That Mud 8 string is a faker. I can't think of the name, but I think it's a British make. Jaydee? Peter Cook??? I've seen 4 string versions - maple board, multiple pole pieces on the pups...

John Birch!



I've played one once, and it sat somewhere between weirdly boutique and weirdly crude. The six knobs were pretty unnecessary. It sounded nothing like a Rickenbacker at least.

A lot of guys used John Birch stuff in the '70s including...




Hahahaha! The old LastBassOutpost switcheroo!

869
Another video with Steve Swallow playing his EB-2D.




And again:



870
The Outpost Cafe / Re: Ritchie Blackmore, Cover Boy
« on: August 07, 2017, 04:57:42 AM »
He was probably done with the trio concept - lots of people (Clapton, Sting) find that tiring/one-dimensional after a while.

I wonder if the technology of the day didn't really help. I have a few Hendrix bootlegs and live releases, and the music does tend to be at one volume. Hendrix was a dynamic player, but sometimes you can hear Noel playing at one volume, with one tone, for most of a set. Had Hendrix been around now, with small amps and pedalboards and baffles and isolation booths and things, maybe he would have a better time of it? Or perhaps he would have done Miles Davis in reverse, produced a sort of anti-Bitches Brew, stop catering to an overlapping rock audience and make more conservatively jazz or Chicago Blues albums with big horn parts and mostly clean guitar work?

I think The Police ultimately ran out of ideas given their formula. The early stuff stacks up well, as it has the reggae cross-time stuff going on with a punk attitude. I'm not sure that formula would work for ever, and it seems that the egos grew dangerously massive in that band.

Pages: 1 ... 56 57 [58] 59 60 ... 110